ESTC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Salesforce has a net margin of -4.22% compared to Elastic NV's net margin of 15.68%. Elastic NV's return on equity of -13.2% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.42%.

Elastic NV has a consensus price target of $111.61, signalling upside risk potential of 31.24%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $349.52 which suggests that it could grow by 35.5%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Elastic NV, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Elastic NV.

Elastic NV has a beta of 1.066, which suggesting that the stock is 6.587% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.365, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.456%.

Elastic NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Elastic NV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Elastic NV quarterly revenues are $388.4M, which are smaller than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $9.8B. Elastic NV's net income of -$16.4M is lower than Salesforce's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Elastic NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 184.15x while Salesforce's PE ratio is 40.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Elastic NV is 5.94x versus 6.48x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Datadog has a net margin of -4.22% compared to Elastic NV's net margin of 3.24%. Elastic NV's return on equity of -13.2% beat Datadog's return on equity of 6.44%.

Elastic NV has a consensus price target of $111.61, signalling upside risk potential of 31.24%. On the other hand Datadog has an analysts' consensus of $143.86 which suggests that it could grow by 3.23%. Given that Elastic NV has higher upside potential than Datadog, analysts believe Elastic NV is more attractive than Datadog.

Elastic NV has a beta of 1.066, which suggesting that the stock is 6.587% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Datadog has a beta of 1.026, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.629%.

Elastic NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Datadog offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Elastic NV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Datadog pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Elastic NV quarterly revenues are $388.4M, which are smaller than Datadog quarterly revenues of $761.6M. Elastic NV's net income of -$16.4M is lower than Datadog's net income of $24.6M. Notably, Elastic NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 184.15x while Datadog's PE ratio is 302.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Elastic NV is 5.94x versus 17.70x for Datadog. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of -4.22% compared to Elastic NV's net margin of 36.86%. Elastic NV's return on equity of -13.2% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Elastic NV has a consensus price target of $111.61, signalling upside risk potential of 31.24%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $533.79 which suggests that it could grow by 5.57%. Given that Elastic NV has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Elastic NV is more attractive than Microsoft.

Elastic NV has a beta of 1.066, which suggesting that the stock is 6.587% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.675%.

Elastic NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Elastic NV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Elastic NV quarterly revenues are $388.4M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Elastic NV's net income of -$16.4M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Elastic NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 184.15x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 39.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Elastic NV is 5.94x versus 13.99x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snowflake has a net margin of -4.22% compared to Elastic NV's net margin of -41.27%. Elastic NV's return on equity of -13.2% beat Snowflake's return on equity of -40.99%.

Elastic NV has a consensus price target of $111.61, signalling upside risk potential of 31.24%. On the other hand Snowflake has an analysts' consensus of $230.66 which suggests that it could grow by 8.83%. Given that Elastic NV has higher upside potential than Snowflake, analysts believe Elastic NV is more attractive than Snowflake.

Elastic NV has a beta of 1.066, which suggesting that the stock is 6.587% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Elastic NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Snowflake offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Elastic NV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Snowflake pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Elastic NV quarterly revenues are $388.4M, which are smaller than Snowflake quarterly revenues of $1B. Elastic NV's net income of -$16.4M is higher than Snowflake's net income of -$430.1M. Notably, Elastic NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 184.15x while Snowflake's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Elastic NV is 5.94x versus 18.35x for Snowflake. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.