DXC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AtlasClear Holdings has a net margin of 8.33% compared to DXC Technology's net margin of -114.15%. DXC Technology's return on equity of 12.05% beat AtlasClear Holdings's return on equity of --.

DXC Technology has a consensus price target of $17.29, signalling upside risk potential of 20.81%. On the other hand AtlasClear Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 449899.91%. Given that AtlasClear Holdings has higher upside potential than DXC Technology, analysts believe AtlasClear Holdings is more attractive than DXC Technology.

DXC Technology has a beta of 1.197, which suggesting that the stock is 19.748% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AtlasClear Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DXC Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AtlasClear Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DXC Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AtlasClear Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DXC Technology quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than AtlasClear Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.5M. DXC Technology's net income of $264M is higher than AtlasClear Holdings's net income of -$2.9M. Notably, DXC Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.78x while AtlasClear Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DXC Technology is 0.20x versus 0.01x for AtlasClear Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Aurora Innovation has a net margin of 8.33% compared to DXC Technology's net margin of --. DXC Technology's return on equity of 12.05% beat Aurora Innovation's return on equity of --.

DXC Technology has a consensus price target of $17.29, signalling upside risk potential of 20.81%. On the other hand Aurora Innovation has an analysts' consensus of $10.51 which suggests that it could grow by 73.43%. Given that Aurora Innovation has higher upside potential than DXC Technology, analysts believe Aurora Innovation is more attractive than DXC Technology.

DXC Technology has a beta of 1.197, which suggesting that the stock is 19.748% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aurora Innovation has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DXC Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aurora Innovation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DXC Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aurora Innovation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DXC Technology quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Aurora Innovation quarterly revenues of --. DXC Technology's net income of $264M is higher than Aurora Innovation's net income of -$208M. Notably, DXC Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.78x while Aurora Innovation's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DXC Technology is 0.20x versus 148.85x for Aurora Innovation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a net margin of 8.33% compared to DXC Technology's net margin of 2.9%. DXC Technology's return on equity of 12.05% beat Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 2.47%.

DXC Technology has a consensus price target of $17.29, signalling upside risk potential of 20.81%. On the other hand Grid Dynamics Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $17.75 which suggests that it could grow by 61.22%. Given that Grid Dynamics Holdings has higher upside potential than DXC Technology, analysts believe Grid Dynamics Holdings is more attractive than DXC Technology.

DXC Technology has a beta of 1.197, which suggesting that the stock is 19.748% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 1.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.713%.

DXC Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Grid Dynamics Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DXC Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DXC Technology quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues of $100.4M. DXC Technology's net income of $264M is higher than Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $2.9M. Notably, DXC Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.78x while Grid Dynamics Holdings's PE ratio is 91.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DXC Technology is 0.20x versus 2.47x for Grid Dynamics Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verra Mobility has a net margin of 8.33% compared to DXC Technology's net margin of 14.49%. DXC Technology's return on equity of 12.05% beat Verra Mobility's return on equity of 8.93%.

DXC Technology has a consensus price target of $17.29, signalling upside risk potential of 20.81%. On the other hand Verra Mobility has an analysts' consensus of $28.92 which suggests that it could grow by 15.85%. Given that DXC Technology has higher upside potential than Verra Mobility, analysts believe DXC Technology is more attractive than Verra Mobility.

DXC Technology has a beta of 1.197, which suggesting that the stock is 19.748% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verra Mobility has a beta of 0.774, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.644%.

DXC Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Verra Mobility offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DXC Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Verra Mobility pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DXC Technology quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Verra Mobility quarterly revenues of $223.3M. DXC Technology's net income of $264M is higher than Verra Mobility's net income of $32.3M. Notably, DXC Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.78x while Verra Mobility's PE ratio is 124.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DXC Technology is 0.20x versus 4.64x for Verra Mobility. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.