AUR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AtlasClear Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Aurora Innovation's net margin of -114.15%. Aurora Innovation's return on equity of -- beat AtlasClear Holdings's return on equity of --.

Aurora Innovation has a consensus price target of $10.51, signalling upside risk potential of 63.96%. On the other hand AtlasClear Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 489030.34%. Given that AtlasClear Holdings has higher upside potential than Aurora Innovation, analysts believe AtlasClear Holdings is more attractive than Aurora Innovation.

Aurora Innovation has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AtlasClear Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Aurora Innovation has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AtlasClear Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aurora Innovation pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AtlasClear Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aurora Innovation quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AtlasClear Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Aurora Innovation's net income of -$208M is lower than AtlasClear Holdings's net income of -$2.9M. Notably, Aurora Innovation's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AtlasClear Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aurora Innovation is 157.45x versus 0.01x for AtlasClear Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progress Software has a net margin of -- compared to Aurora Innovation's net margin of 7.18%. Aurora Innovation's return on equity of -- beat Progress Software's return on equity of 13.39%.

Aurora Innovation has a consensus price target of $10.51, signalling upside risk potential of 63.96%. On the other hand Progress Software has an analysts' consensus of $71.67 which suggests that it could grow by 47.11%. Given that Aurora Innovation has higher upside potential than Progress Software, analysts believe Aurora Innovation is more attractive than Progress Software.

Aurora Innovation has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progress Software has a beta of 0.675, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.454%.

Aurora Innovation has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Progress Software offers a yield of 1.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Aurora Innovation pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Progress Software pays out 45.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Progress Software's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aurora Innovation quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Progress Software quarterly revenues of $237.4M. Aurora Innovation's net income of -$208M is lower than Progress Software's net income of $17M. Notably, Aurora Innovation's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Progress Software's PE ratio is 37.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aurora Innovation is 157.45x versus 2.49x for Progress Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Veea has a net margin of -- compared to Aurora Innovation's net margin of -65748.98%. Aurora Innovation's return on equity of -- beat Veea's return on equity of --.

Aurora Innovation has a consensus price target of $10.51, signalling upside risk potential of 63.96%. On the other hand Veea has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aurora Innovation has higher upside potential than Veea, analysts believe Aurora Innovation is more attractive than Veea.

Aurora Innovation has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Veea has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Aurora Innovation has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Veea offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aurora Innovation pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Veea pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aurora Innovation quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Veea quarterly revenues of $14.3K. Aurora Innovation's net income of -$208M is lower than Veea's net income of $4.3M. Notably, Aurora Innovation's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Veea's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aurora Innovation is 157.45x versus 431.75x for Veea. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verra Mobility has a net margin of -- compared to Aurora Innovation's net margin of 14.49%. Aurora Innovation's return on equity of -- beat Verra Mobility's return on equity of 8.93%.

Aurora Innovation has a consensus price target of $10.51, signalling upside risk potential of 63.96%. On the other hand Verra Mobility has an analysts' consensus of $28.92 which suggests that it could grow by 16.27%. Given that Aurora Innovation has higher upside potential than Verra Mobility, analysts believe Aurora Innovation is more attractive than Verra Mobility.

Aurora Innovation has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verra Mobility has a beta of 0.774, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.644%.

Aurora Innovation has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Verra Mobility offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aurora Innovation pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Verra Mobility pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aurora Innovation quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Verra Mobility quarterly revenues of $223.3M. Aurora Innovation's net income of -$208M is lower than Verra Mobility's net income of $32.3M. Notably, Aurora Innovation's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Verra Mobility's PE ratio is 124.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aurora Innovation is 157.45x versus 4.63x for Verra Mobility. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.