BILL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Paylocity Holding has a net margin of -3.24% compared to BILL Holdings's net margin of 20.13%. BILL Holdings's return on equity of 0.97% beat Paylocity Holding's return on equity of 18.89%.

BILL Holdings has a consensus price target of $63.31, signalling upside risk potential of 37.93%. On the other hand Paylocity Holding has an analysts' consensus of $222.38 which suggests that it could grow by 21.92%. Given that BILL Holdings has higher upside potential than Paylocity Holding, analysts believe BILL Holdings is more attractive than Paylocity Holding.

BILL Holdings has a beta of 1.349, which suggesting that the stock is 34.942% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paylocity Holding has a beta of 0.504, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.588%.

BILL Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paylocity Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BILL Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paylocity Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BILL Holdings quarterly revenues are $358.2M, which are smaller than Paylocity Holding quarterly revenues of $454.5M. BILL Holdings's net income of -$11.6M is lower than Paylocity Holding's net income of $91.5M. Notably, BILL Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paylocity Holding's PE ratio is 48.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BILL Holdings is 3.39x versus 6.88x for Paylocity Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Q2 Holdings has a net margin of -3.24% compared to BILL Holdings's net margin of 2.51%. BILL Holdings's return on equity of 0.97% beat Q2 Holdings's return on equity of -3.98%.

BILL Holdings has a consensus price target of $63.31, signalling upside risk potential of 37.93%. On the other hand Q2 Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $101.26 which suggests that it could grow by 12%. Given that BILL Holdings has higher upside potential than Q2 Holdings, analysts believe BILL Holdings is more attractive than Q2 Holdings.

BILL Holdings has a beta of 1.349, which suggesting that the stock is 34.942% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Q2 Holdings has a beta of 1.485, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.51%.

BILL Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Q2 Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BILL Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Q2 Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BILL Holdings quarterly revenues are $358.2M, which are larger than Q2 Holdings quarterly revenues of $189.7M. BILL Holdings's net income of -$11.6M is lower than Q2 Holdings's net income of $4.8M. Notably, BILL Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Q2 Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BILL Holdings is 3.39x versus 7.71x for Q2 Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sprout Social has a net margin of -3.24% compared to BILL Holdings's net margin of -10.27%. BILL Holdings's return on equity of 0.97% beat Sprout Social's return on equity of -37.29%.

BILL Holdings has a consensus price target of $63.31, signalling upside risk potential of 37.93%. On the other hand Sprout Social has an analysts' consensus of $27.00 which suggests that it could grow by 44.93%. Given that Sprout Social has higher upside potential than BILL Holdings, analysts believe Sprout Social is more attractive than BILL Holdings.

BILL Holdings has a beta of 1.349, which suggesting that the stock is 34.942% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprout Social has a beta of 1.015, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.505%.

BILL Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sprout Social offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BILL Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprout Social pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BILL Holdings quarterly revenues are $358.2M, which are larger than Sprout Social quarterly revenues of $109.3M. BILL Holdings's net income of -$11.6M is lower than Sprout Social's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, BILL Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprout Social's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BILL Holdings is 3.39x versus 2.55x for Sprout Social. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of -3.24% compared to BILL Holdings's net margin of 3.04%. BILL Holdings's return on equity of 0.97% beat Workday's return on equity of 5.65%.

BILL Holdings has a consensus price target of $63.31, signalling upside risk potential of 37.93%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $296.88 which suggests that it could grow by 30.94%. Given that BILL Holdings has higher upside potential than Workday, analysts believe BILL Holdings is more attractive than Workday.

BILL Holdings has a beta of 1.349, which suggesting that the stock is 34.942% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.122%.

BILL Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BILL Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BILL Holdings quarterly revenues are $358.2M, which are smaller than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. BILL Holdings's net income of -$11.6M is lower than Workday's net income of $68M. Notably, BILL Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Workday's PE ratio is 125.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BILL Holdings is 3.39x versus 7.02x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.