ASX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES has a net margin of 5.1% compared to ASE Technology Holding's net margin of 4.3%. ASE Technology Holding's return on equity of 10.43% beat ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES's return on equity of 18.23%.

ASE Technology Holding has a consensus price target of $11.01, signalling upside risk potential of 5.69%. On the other hand ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ASE Technology Holding has higher upside potential than ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES, analysts believe ASE Technology Holding is more attractive than ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES.

ASE Technology Holding has a beta of 1.236, which suggesting that the stock is 23.592% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES has a beta of 0.946, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.442%.

ASE Technology Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.45%. ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES offers a yield of 4.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. ASE Technology Holding pays 69.36% of its earnings as a dividend. ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES pays out 90.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ASE Technology Holding quarterly revenues are $4.5B, which are larger than ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES quarterly revenues of $167M. ASE Technology Holding's net income of $229.6M is higher than ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES's net income of $7.2M. Notably, ASE Technology Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.14x while ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES's PE ratio is 15.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASE Technology Holding is 1.22x versus 0.94x for ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SemiLEDs has a net margin of 5.1% compared to ASE Technology Holding's net margin of 1.26%. ASE Technology Holding's return on equity of 10.43% beat SemiLEDs's return on equity of -17.49%.

ASE Technology Holding has a consensus price target of $11.01, signalling upside risk potential of 5.69%. On the other hand SemiLEDs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ASE Technology Holding has higher upside potential than SemiLEDs, analysts believe ASE Technology Holding is more attractive than SemiLEDs.

ASE Technology Holding has a beta of 1.236, which suggesting that the stock is 23.592% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SemiLEDs has a beta of 0.965, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.534%.

ASE Technology Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.45%. SemiLEDs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ASE Technology Holding pays 69.36% of its earnings as a dividend. SemiLEDs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ASE Technology Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ASE Technology Holding quarterly revenues are $4.5B, which are larger than SemiLEDs quarterly revenues of $17.7M. ASE Technology Holding's net income of $229.6M is higher than SemiLEDs's net income of $223K. Notably, ASE Technology Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.14x while SemiLEDs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASE Technology Holding is 1.22x versus 0.59x for SemiLEDs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perfect has a net margin of 5.1% compared to ASE Technology Holding's net margin of 14.32%. ASE Technology Holding's return on equity of 10.43% beat Perfect's return on equity of 4.61%.

ASE Technology Holding has a consensus price target of $11.01, signalling upside risk potential of 5.69%. On the other hand Perfect has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 73.91%. Given that Perfect has higher upside potential than ASE Technology Holding, analysts believe Perfect is more attractive than ASE Technology Holding.

ASE Technology Holding has a beta of 1.236, which suggesting that the stock is 23.592% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perfect has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

ASE Technology Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.45%. Perfect offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ASE Technology Holding pays 69.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Perfect pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ASE Technology Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ASE Technology Holding quarterly revenues are $4.5B, which are larger than Perfect quarterly revenues of $16M. ASE Technology Holding's net income of $229.6M is higher than Perfect's net income of $2.3M. Notably, ASE Technology Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.14x while Perfect's PE ratio is 34.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASE Technology Holding is 1.22x versus 3.73x for Perfect. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Semilux International has a net margin of 5.1% compared to ASE Technology Holding's net margin of --. ASE Technology Holding's return on equity of 10.43% beat Semilux International's return on equity of --.

ASE Technology Holding has a consensus price target of $11.01, signalling upside risk potential of 5.69%. On the other hand Semilux International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ASE Technology Holding has higher upside potential than Semilux International, analysts believe ASE Technology Holding is more attractive than Semilux International.

ASE Technology Holding has a beta of 1.236, which suggesting that the stock is 23.592% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Semilux International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

ASE Technology Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.45%. Semilux International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ASE Technology Holding pays 69.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Semilux International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ASE Technology Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ASE Technology Holding quarterly revenues are $4.5B, which are larger than Semilux International quarterly revenues of --. ASE Technology Holding's net income of $229.6M is higher than Semilux International's net income of --. Notably, ASE Technology Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.14x while Semilux International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASE Technology Holding is 1.22x versus -- for Semilux International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.