PERF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing has a net margin of 14.32% compared to Perfect's net margin of 24.04%. Perfect's return on equity of 4.61% beat Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 78.53%.

Perfect has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 73.91%. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing has an analysts' consensus of $315.34 which suggests that it could grow by 5.02%. Given that Perfect has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe Perfect is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

Perfect has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.761, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.887%.

Perfect has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share. Perfect pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing pays out 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Perfect quarterly revenues are $16M, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Perfect's net income of $2.3M is lower than Automatic Data Processing's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Perfect's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.85x while Automatic Data Processing's PE ratio is 30.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perfect is 3.73x versus 6.45x for Automatic Data Processing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Autodesk has a net margin of 14.32% compared to Perfect's net margin of 9.31%. Perfect's return on equity of 4.61% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 40.52%.

Perfect has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 73.91%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $340.21 which suggests that it could grow by 17.53%. Given that Perfect has higher upside potential than Autodesk, analysts believe Perfect is more attractive than Autodesk.

Perfect has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.439, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.944%.

Perfect has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Perfect pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Perfect quarterly revenues are $16M, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Perfect's net income of $2.3M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $152M. Notably, Perfect's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.85x while Autodesk's PE ratio is 61.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perfect is 3.73x versus 9.89x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Agilysys has a net margin of 14.32% compared to Perfect's net margin of 5.29%. Perfect's return on equity of 4.61% beat Agilysys's return on equity of 9.12%.

Perfect has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 73.91%. On the other hand Agilysys has an analysts' consensus of $123.40 which suggests that it could grow by 5.55%. Given that Perfect has higher upside potential than Agilysys, analysts believe Perfect is more attractive than Agilysys.

Perfect has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agilysys has a beta of 0.747, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.316%.

Perfect has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Agilysys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Perfect pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Perfect quarterly revenues are $16M, which are smaller than Agilysys quarterly revenues of $74.3M. Perfect's net income of $2.3M is lower than Agilysys's net income of $3.9M. Notably, Perfect's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.85x while Agilysys's PE ratio is 140.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perfect is 3.73x versus 11.97x for Agilysys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of 14.32% compared to Perfect's net margin of -4.72%. Perfect's return on equity of 4.61% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -36.12%.

Perfect has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 73.91%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 160.62%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Perfect, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Perfect.

Perfect has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 1.534, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.432%.

Perfect has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Perfect pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Perfect quarterly revenues are $16M, which are smaller than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.7M. Perfect's net income of $2.3M is higher than Inuvo's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Perfect's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.85x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perfect is 3.73x versus 0.78x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.