AGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gold Royalty has a net margin of 4.57% compared to Alamos Gold's net margin of -39.77%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 7.7% beat Gold Royalty's return on equity of -0.59%.

Alamos Gold has a consensus price target of $35.50, signalling upside risk potential of 42.63%. On the other hand Gold Royalty has an analysts' consensus of $3.33 which suggests that it could grow by 40.65%. Given that Alamos Gold has higher upside potential than Gold Royalty, analysts believe Alamos Gold is more attractive than Gold Royalty.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.541, which suggesting that the stock is 45.875% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Alamos Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.4%. Gold Royalty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Alamos Gold pays 12.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamos Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamos Gold quarterly revenues are $333M, which are larger than Gold Royalty quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Alamos Gold's net income of $15.2M is higher than Gold Royalty's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Alamos Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.15x while Gold Royalty's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamos Gold is 7.36x versus 38.00x for Gold Royalty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McEwen has a net margin of 4.57% compared to Alamos Gold's net margin of -17.57%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 7.7% beat McEwen's return on equity of -6.05%.

Alamos Gold has a consensus price target of $35.50, signalling upside risk potential of 42.63%. On the other hand McEwen has an analysts' consensus of $15.06 which suggests that it could grow by 37.56%. Given that Alamos Gold has higher upside potential than McEwen, analysts believe Alamos Gold is more attractive than McEwen.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.541, which suggesting that the stock is 45.875% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen has a beta of 0.985, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.544%.

Alamos Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.4%. McEwen offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamos Gold pays 12.35% of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamos Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamos Gold quarterly revenues are $333M, which are larger than McEwen quarterly revenues of $35.7M. Alamos Gold's net income of $15.2M is higher than McEwen's net income of -$6.3M. Notably, Alamos Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.15x while McEwen's PE ratio is 3.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamos Gold is 7.36x versus 3.37x for McEwen. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Newmont has a net margin of 4.57% compared to Alamos Gold's net margin of 37.75%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 7.7% beat Newmont's return on equity of 16.89%.

Alamos Gold has a consensus price target of $35.50, signalling upside risk potential of 42.63%. On the other hand Newmont has an analysts' consensus of $67.25 which suggests that it could grow by 15.58%. Given that Alamos Gold has higher upside potential than Newmont, analysts believe Alamos Gold is more attractive than Newmont.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.541, which suggesting that the stock is 45.875% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newmont has a beta of 0.332, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.805%.

Alamos Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.4%. Newmont offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Alamos Gold pays 12.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmont pays out 34.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamos Gold quarterly revenues are $333M, which are smaller than Newmont quarterly revenues of $5B. Alamos Gold's net income of $15.2M is lower than Newmont's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Alamos Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.15x while Newmont's PE ratio is 13.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamos Gold is 7.36x versus 3.38x for Newmont. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold has a net margin of 4.57% compared to Alamos Gold's net margin of --. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 7.7% beat Seabridge Gold's return on equity of --.

Alamos Gold has a consensus price target of $35.50, signalling upside risk potential of 42.63%. On the other hand Seabridge Gold has an analysts' consensus of $41.58 which suggests that it could grow by 164.7%. Given that Seabridge Gold has higher upside potential than Alamos Gold, analysts believe Seabridge Gold is more attractive than Alamos Gold.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.541, which suggesting that the stock is 45.875% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold has a beta of 0.667, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.275%.

Alamos Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.4%. Seabridge Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamos Gold pays 12.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamos Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamos Gold quarterly revenues are $333M, which are larger than Seabridge Gold quarterly revenues of --. Alamos Gold's net income of $15.2M is higher than Seabridge Gold's net income of $7.3M. Notably, Alamos Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.15x while Seabridge Gold's PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamos Gold is 7.36x versus -- for Seabridge Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.