AUST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gold Royalty has a net margin of -- compared to Austin Gold's net margin of -39.77%. Austin Gold's return on equity of -- beat Gold Royalty's return on equity of -0.59%.

Austin Gold has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 124.03%. On the other hand Gold Royalty has an analysts' consensus of $3.33 which suggests that it could grow by 36.61%. Given that Austin Gold has higher upside potential than Gold Royalty, analysts believe Austin Gold is more attractive than Gold Royalty.

Austin Gold has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Austin Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Austin Gold pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Austin Gold quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gold Royalty quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Austin Gold's net income of -$499.5K is higher than Gold Royalty's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Austin Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Royalty's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Austin Gold is -- versus 39.12x for Gold Royalty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McEwen has a net margin of -- compared to Austin Gold's net margin of -17.57%. Austin Gold's return on equity of -- beat McEwen's return on equity of -6.05%.

Austin Gold has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 124.03%. On the other hand McEwen has an analysts' consensus of $15.06 which suggests that it could grow by 36.68%. Given that Austin Gold has higher upside potential than McEwen, analysts believe Austin Gold is more attractive than McEwen.

Austin Gold has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen has a beta of 0.985, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.544%.

Austin Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. McEwen offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Austin Gold pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Austin Gold quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than McEwen quarterly revenues of $35.7M. Austin Gold's net income of -$499.5K is higher than McEwen's net income of -$6.3M. Notably, Austin Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while McEwen's PE ratio is 3.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Austin Gold is -- versus 3.39x for McEwen. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rise Gold has a net margin of -- compared to Austin Gold's net margin of --. Austin Gold's return on equity of -- beat Rise Gold's return on equity of --.

Austin Gold has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 124.03%. On the other hand Rise Gold has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Austin Gold has higher upside potential than Rise Gold, analysts believe Austin Gold is more attractive than Rise Gold.

Austin Gold has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rise Gold has a beta of -1.278, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 227.842%.

Austin Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rise Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Austin Gold pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rise Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Austin Gold quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rise Gold quarterly revenues of --. Austin Gold's net income of -$499.5K is higher than Rise Gold's net income of -$756K. Notably, Austin Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rise Gold's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Austin Gold is -- versus -- for Rise Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold has a net margin of -- compared to Austin Gold's net margin of --. Austin Gold's return on equity of -- beat Seabridge Gold's return on equity of --.

Austin Gold has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 124.03%. On the other hand Seabridge Gold has an analysts' consensus of $41.58 which suggests that it could grow by 163.86%. Given that Seabridge Gold has higher upside potential than Austin Gold, analysts believe Seabridge Gold is more attractive than Austin Gold.

Austin Gold has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold has a beta of 0.667, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.275%.

Austin Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seabridge Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Austin Gold pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Austin Gold quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Seabridge Gold quarterly revenues of --. Austin Gold's net income of -$499.5K is lower than Seabridge Gold's net income of $7.3M. Notably, Austin Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seabridge Gold's PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Austin Gold is -- versus -- for Seabridge Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.