ABG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a net margin of 3.18% compared to Asbury Automotive Group's net margin of -9.82%. Asbury Automotive Group's return on equity of 12.1% beat Big 5 Sporting Goods's return on equity of -39.38%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a consensus price target of $252.88, signalling upside risk potential of 1.92%. On the other hand Big 5 Sporting Goods has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 216.9%. Given that Big 5 Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than Asbury Automotive Group, analysts believe Big 5 Sporting Goods is more attractive than Asbury Automotive Group.

Asbury Automotive Group has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.133% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Big 5 Sporting Goods has a beta of 2.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.727%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Big 5 Sporting Goods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Asbury Automotive Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Big 5 Sporting Goods pays out -4.1% of its earnings as a dividend.

Asbury Automotive Group quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Big 5 Sporting Goods quarterly revenues of $175.6M. Asbury Automotive Group's net income of $132.1M is higher than Big 5 Sporting Goods's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Asbury Automotive Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.81x while Big 5 Sporting Goods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asbury Automotive Group is 0.29x versus 0.04x for Big 5 Sporting Goods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lithia Motors has a net margin of 3.18% compared to Asbury Automotive Group's net margin of 2.28%. Asbury Automotive Group's return on equity of 12.1% beat Lithia Motors's return on equity of 12.88%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a consensus price target of $252.88, signalling upside risk potential of 1.92%. On the other hand Lithia Motors has an analysts' consensus of $393.16 which suggests that it could grow by 18.7%. Given that Lithia Motors has higher upside potential than Asbury Automotive Group, analysts believe Lithia Motors is more attractive than Asbury Automotive Group.

Asbury Automotive Group has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.133% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lithia Motors has a beta of 1.459, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.904%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lithia Motors offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Asbury Automotive Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lithia Motors pays out 7.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Lithia Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asbury Automotive Group quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than Lithia Motors quarterly revenues of $9.2B. Asbury Automotive Group's net income of $132.1M is lower than Lithia Motors's net income of $209.5M. Notably, Asbury Automotive Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.81x while Lithia Motors's PE ratio is 10.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asbury Automotive Group is 0.29x versus 0.24x for Lithia Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Penske Automotive Group has a net margin of 3.18% compared to Asbury Automotive Group's net margin of 3.21%. Asbury Automotive Group's return on equity of 12.1% beat Penske Automotive Group's return on equity of 18.44%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a consensus price target of $252.88, signalling upside risk potential of 1.92%. On the other hand Penske Automotive Group has an analysts' consensus of $169.54 which suggests that it could fall by -3.32%. Given that Asbury Automotive Group has higher upside potential than Penske Automotive Group, analysts believe Asbury Automotive Group is more attractive than Penske Automotive Group.

Asbury Automotive Group has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.133% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Penske Automotive Group has a beta of 0.907, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.251%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Penske Automotive Group offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share. Asbury Automotive Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Penske Automotive Group pays out 29.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Penske Automotive Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asbury Automotive Group quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than Penske Automotive Group quarterly revenues of $7.6B. Asbury Automotive Group's net income of $132.1M is lower than Penske Automotive Group's net income of $244.3M. Notably, Asbury Automotive Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.81x while Penske Automotive Group's PE ratio is 12.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asbury Automotive Group is 0.29x versus 0.38x for Penske Automotive Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sonic Automotive has a net margin of 3.18% compared to Asbury Automotive Group's net margin of 1.93%. Asbury Automotive Group's return on equity of 12.1% beat Sonic Automotive's return on equity of 24.38%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a consensus price target of $252.88, signalling upside risk potential of 1.92%. On the other hand Sonic Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $72.44 which suggests that it could fall by -18.2%. Given that Asbury Automotive Group has higher upside potential than Sonic Automotive, analysts believe Asbury Automotive Group is more attractive than Sonic Automotive.

Asbury Automotive Group has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.133% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sonic Automotive has a beta of 1.042, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.188%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sonic Automotive offers a yield of 1.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Asbury Automotive Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sonic Automotive pays out 18.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Sonic Automotive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asbury Automotive Group quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Sonic Automotive quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Asbury Automotive Group's net income of $132.1M is higher than Sonic Automotive's net income of $70.6M. Notably, Asbury Automotive Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.81x while Sonic Automotive's PE ratio is 12.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asbury Automotive Group is 0.29x versus 0.21x for Sonic Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.