MPU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cineverse has a net margin of -26.8% compared to Mega Matrix's net margin of 17.46%. Mega Matrix's return on equity of -52.45% beat Cineverse's return on equity of -35.17%.

Mega Matrix has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -7.14%. On the other hand Cineverse has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 44.82%. Given that Cineverse has higher upside potential than Mega Matrix, analysts believe Cineverse is more attractive than Mega Matrix.

Mega Matrix has a beta of 2.253, which suggesting that the stock is 125.279% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cineverse has a beta of 1.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.08%.

Mega Matrix has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cineverse offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mega Matrix pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cineverse pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mega Matrix quarterly revenues are $10.3M, which are smaller than Cineverse quarterly revenues of $40.7M. Mega Matrix's net income of -$2.8M is lower than Cineverse's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Mega Matrix's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cineverse's PE ratio is 72.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mega Matrix is 2.26x versus 1.42x for Cineverse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Liberty Media has a net margin of -26.8% compared to Mega Matrix's net margin of 1.12%. Mega Matrix's return on equity of -52.45% beat Liberty Media's return on equity of -1.44%.

Mega Matrix has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -7.14%. On the other hand Liberty Media has an analysts' consensus of $100.17 which suggests that it could grow by 9.45%. Given that Liberty Media has higher upside potential than Mega Matrix, analysts believe Liberty Media is more attractive than Mega Matrix.

Mega Matrix has a beta of 2.253, which suggesting that the stock is 125.279% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liberty Media has a beta of 0.866, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.431%.

Mega Matrix has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Liberty Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.23 per share. Mega Matrix pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Liberty Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mega Matrix quarterly revenues are $10.3M, which are smaller than Liberty Media quarterly revenues of $447M. Mega Matrix's net income of -$2.8M is lower than Liberty Media's net income of $5M. Notably, Mega Matrix's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Liberty Media's PE ratio is 73.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mega Matrix is 2.26x versus 6.43x for Liberty Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gaia has a net margin of -26.8% compared to Mega Matrix's net margin of -4.25%. Mega Matrix's return on equity of -52.45% beat Gaia's return on equity of -5.53%.

Mega Matrix has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -7.14%. On the other hand Gaia has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could grow by 99.5%. Given that Gaia has higher upside potential than Mega Matrix, analysts believe Gaia is more attractive than Mega Matrix.

Mega Matrix has a beta of 2.253, which suggesting that the stock is 125.279% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gaia has a beta of 0.980, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.989%.

Mega Matrix has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gaia offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mega Matrix pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gaia pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mega Matrix quarterly revenues are $10.3M, which are smaller than Gaia quarterly revenues of $23.8M. Mega Matrix's net income of -$2.8M is lower than Gaia's net income of -$1M. Notably, Mega Matrix's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gaia's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mega Matrix is 2.26x versus 1.02x for Gaia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Global has a net margin of -26.8% compared to Mega Matrix's net margin of 2.11%. Mega Matrix's return on equity of -52.45% beat Paramount Global's return on equity of -30.44%.

Mega Matrix has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -7.14%. On the other hand Paramount Global has an analysts' consensus of $11.98 which suggests that it could fall by -7.63%. Given that Paramount Global has more downside risk than Mega Matrix, analysts believe Mega Matrix is more attractive than Paramount Global.

Mega Matrix has a beta of 2.253, which suggesting that the stock is 125.279% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Global has a beta of 1.194, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.406%.

Mega Matrix has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Global offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Mega Matrix pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Global pays out -2.71% of its earnings as a dividend.

Mega Matrix quarterly revenues are $10.3M, which are smaller than Paramount Global quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Mega Matrix's net income of -$2.8M is lower than Paramount Global's net income of $152M. Notably, Mega Matrix's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mega Matrix is 2.26x versus 0.30x for Paramount Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.