RRR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boyd Gaming has a net margin of 8.99% compared to Red Rock Resorts's net margin of 11.24%. Red Rock Resorts's return on equity of 58.75% beat Boyd Gaming's return on equity of 34.42%.

Red Rock Resorts has a consensus price target of $56.00, signalling upside risk potential of 0.65%. On the other hand Boyd Gaming has an analysts' consensus of $85.77 which suggests that it could grow by 4.99%. Given that Boyd Gaming has higher upside potential than Red Rock Resorts, analysts believe Boyd Gaming is more attractive than Red Rock Resorts.

Red Rock Resorts has a beta of 1.624, which suggesting that the stock is 62.388% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boyd Gaming has a beta of 1.258, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.763%.

Red Rock Resorts has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Boyd Gaming offers a yield of 0.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Red Rock Resorts pays 76.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Boyd Gaming pays out 10.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red Rock Resorts quarterly revenues are $497.9M, which are smaller than Boyd Gaming quarterly revenues of $991.6M. Red Rock Resorts's net income of $44.7M is lower than Boyd Gaming's net income of $111.4M. Notably, Red Rock Resorts's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.57x while Boyd Gaming's PE ratio is 13.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Rock Resorts is 2.65x versus 1.86x for Boyd Gaming. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DraftKings has a net margin of 8.99% compared to Red Rock Resorts's net margin of -2.4%. Red Rock Resorts's return on equity of 58.75% beat DraftKings's return on equity of -39.16%.

Red Rock Resorts has a consensus price target of $56.00, signalling upside risk potential of 0.65%. On the other hand DraftKings has an analysts' consensus of $52.63 which suggests that it could grow by 21.38%. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than Red Rock Resorts, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than Red Rock Resorts.

Red Rock Resorts has a beta of 1.624, which suggesting that the stock is 62.388% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DraftKings has a beta of 1.670, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.969%.

Red Rock Resorts has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. DraftKings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Rock Resorts pays 76.86% of its earnings as a dividend. DraftKings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Rock Resorts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red Rock Resorts quarterly revenues are $497.9M, which are smaller than DraftKings quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Red Rock Resorts's net income of $44.7M is higher than DraftKings's net income of -$33.9M. Notably, Red Rock Resorts's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.57x while DraftKings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Rock Resorts is 2.65x versus 4.30x for DraftKings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Full House Resorts has a net margin of 8.99% compared to Red Rock Resorts's net margin of -13.01%. Red Rock Resorts's return on equity of 58.75% beat Full House Resorts's return on equity of -78.31%.

Red Rock Resorts has a consensus price target of $56.00, signalling upside risk potential of 0.65%. On the other hand Full House Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $4.75 which suggests that it could grow by 3.26%. Given that Full House Resorts has higher upside potential than Red Rock Resorts, analysts believe Full House Resorts is more attractive than Red Rock Resorts.

Red Rock Resorts has a beta of 1.624, which suggesting that the stock is 62.388% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.639, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.872%.

Red Rock Resorts has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Full House Resorts offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Rock Resorts pays 76.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Full House Resorts pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Rock Resorts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red Rock Resorts quarterly revenues are $497.9M, which are larger than Full House Resorts quarterly revenues of $75.1M. Red Rock Resorts's net income of $44.7M is higher than Full House Resorts's net income of -$9.8M. Notably, Red Rock Resorts's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.57x while Full House Resorts's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Rock Resorts is 2.65x versus 0.55x for Full House Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golden Entertainment has a net margin of 8.99% compared to Red Rock Resorts's net margin of 1.55%. Red Rock Resorts's return on equity of 58.75% beat Golden Entertainment's return on equity of 2.2%.

Red Rock Resorts has a consensus price target of $56.00, signalling upside risk potential of 0.65%. On the other hand Golden Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $34.86 which suggests that it could grow by 19.13%. Given that Golden Entertainment has higher upside potential than Red Rock Resorts, analysts believe Golden Entertainment is more attractive than Red Rock Resorts.

Red Rock Resorts has a beta of 1.624, which suggesting that the stock is 62.388% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golden Entertainment has a beta of 1.783, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.326%.

Red Rock Resorts has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Golden Entertainment offers a yield of 3.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Red Rock Resorts pays 76.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Entertainment pays out 42% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red Rock Resorts quarterly revenues are $497.9M, which are larger than Golden Entertainment quarterly revenues of $160.8M. Red Rock Resorts's net income of $44.7M is higher than Golden Entertainment's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Red Rock Resorts's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.57x while Golden Entertainment's PE ratio is 75.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Rock Resorts is 2.65x versus 1.30x for Golden Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.