ROAD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Comfort Systems USA has a net margin of 0.74% compared to Construction Partners's net margin of 9.24%. Construction Partners's return on equity of 9.38% beat Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 37.57%.

Construction Partners has a consensus price target of $112.50, signalling upside risk potential of 3.05%. On the other hand Comfort Systems USA has an analysts' consensus of $541.54 which suggests that it could fall by -0.93%. Given that Construction Partners has higher upside potential than Comfort Systems USA, analysts believe Construction Partners is more attractive than Comfort Systems USA.

Construction Partners has a beta of 0.956, which suggesting that the stock is 4.36% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.508, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.842%.

Construction Partners has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Comfort Systems USA offers a yield of 0.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Construction Partners pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA pays out 8.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Construction Partners quarterly revenues are $571.7M, which are smaller than Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Construction Partners's net income of $4.2M is lower than Comfort Systems USA's net income of $169.3M. Notably, Construction Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 93.31x while Comfort Systems USA's PE ratio is 32.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Construction Partners is 2.68x versus 2.67x for Comfort Systems USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of 0.74% compared to Construction Partners's net margin of 13.76%. Construction Partners's return on equity of 9.38% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 15.97%.

Construction Partners has a consensus price target of $112.50, signalling upside risk potential of 3.05%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 34.29%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Construction Partners, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Construction Partners.

Construction Partners has a beta of 0.956, which suggesting that the stock is 4.36% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.304, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.365%.

Construction Partners has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Construction Partners pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Construction Partners quarterly revenues are $571.7M, which are larger than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues of $242.9M. Construction Partners's net income of $4.2M is lower than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $33.4M. Notably, Construction Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 93.31x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's PE ratio is 10.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Construction Partners is 2.68x versus 0.94x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Granite Construction has a net margin of 0.74% compared to Construction Partners's net margin of -4.81%. Construction Partners's return on equity of 9.38% beat Granite Construction's return on equity of 11.94%.

Construction Partners has a consensus price target of $112.50, signalling upside risk potential of 3.05%. On the other hand Granite Construction has an analysts' consensus of $101.75 which suggests that it could grow by 10.02%. Given that Granite Construction has higher upside potential than Construction Partners, analysts believe Granite Construction is more attractive than Construction Partners.

Construction Partners has a beta of 0.956, which suggesting that the stock is 4.36% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Granite Construction has a beta of 1.325, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.464%.

Construction Partners has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Granite Construction offers a yield of 0.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Construction Partners pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction pays out 18.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Construction Partners quarterly revenues are $571.7M, which are smaller than Granite Construction quarterly revenues of $699.5M. Construction Partners's net income of $4.2M is higher than Granite Construction's net income of -$33.7M. Notably, Construction Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 93.31x while Granite Construction's PE ratio is 38.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Construction Partners is 2.68x versus 1.15x for Granite Construction. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southland Holdings has a net margin of 0.74% compared to Construction Partners's net margin of -1.9%. Construction Partners's return on equity of 9.38% beat Southland Holdings's return on equity of -55.72%.

Construction Partners has a consensus price target of $112.50, signalling upside risk potential of 3.05%. On the other hand Southland Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.50 which suggests that it could grow by 23.87%. Given that Southland Holdings has higher upside potential than Construction Partners, analysts believe Southland Holdings is more attractive than Construction Partners.

Construction Partners has a beta of 0.956, which suggesting that the stock is 4.36% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southland Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Construction Partners has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Southland Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Construction Partners pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Southland Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Construction Partners quarterly revenues are $571.7M, which are larger than Southland Holdings quarterly revenues of $239.5M. Construction Partners's net income of $4.2M is higher than Southland Holdings's net income of -$4.6M. Notably, Construction Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 93.31x while Southland Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Construction Partners is 2.68x versus 0.24x for Southland Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.