MTC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aurora Innovation has a net margin of -- compared to MMTEC's net margin of --. MMTEC's return on equity of -- beat Aurora Innovation's return on equity of --.

MMTEC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Aurora Innovation has an analysts' consensus of $10.51 which suggests that it could grow by 67.89%. Given that Aurora Innovation has higher upside potential than MMTEC, analysts believe Aurora Innovation is more attractive than MMTEC.

MMTEC has a beta of 0.301, which suggesting that the stock is 69.871% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aurora Innovation has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MMTEC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aurora Innovation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MMTEC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aurora Innovation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MMTEC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Aurora Innovation quarterly revenues of --. MMTEC's net income of -- is lower than Aurora Innovation's net income of -$208M. Notably, MMTEC's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.42x while Aurora Innovation's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MMTEC is 22.20x versus 153.76x for Aurora Innovation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Triller has a net margin of -- compared to MMTEC's net margin of --. MMTEC's return on equity of -- beat Triller's return on equity of --.

MMTEC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Triller has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MMTEC has higher upside potential than Triller, analysts believe MMTEC is more attractive than Triller.

MMTEC has a beta of 0.301, which suggesting that the stock is 69.871% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Triller has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MMTEC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Triller offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MMTEC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Triller pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MMTEC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Triller quarterly revenues of --. MMTEC's net income of -- is lower than Triller's net income of --. Notably, MMTEC's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.42x while Triller's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MMTEC is 22.20x versus -- for Triller. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Value Exchange International has a net margin of -- compared to MMTEC's net margin of -12.03%. MMTEC's return on equity of -- beat Value Exchange International's return on equity of --.

MMTEC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Value Exchange International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MMTEC has higher upside potential than Value Exchange International, analysts believe MMTEC is more attractive than Value Exchange International.

MMTEC has a beta of 0.301, which suggesting that the stock is 69.871% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Value Exchange International has a beta of 3.245, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 224.455%.

MMTEC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Value Exchange International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MMTEC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Value Exchange International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MMTEC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Value Exchange International quarterly revenues of $4.4M. MMTEC's net income of -- is lower than Value Exchange International's net income of -$527.6K. Notably, MMTEC's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.42x while Value Exchange International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MMTEC is 22.20x versus 0.03x for Value Exchange International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verra Mobility has a net margin of -- compared to MMTEC's net margin of 14.49%. MMTEC's return on equity of -- beat Verra Mobility's return on equity of 8.93%.

MMTEC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Verra Mobility has an analysts' consensus of $28.92 which suggests that it could grow by 17.36%. Given that Verra Mobility has higher upside potential than MMTEC, analysts believe Verra Mobility is more attractive than MMTEC.

MMTEC has a beta of 0.301, which suggesting that the stock is 69.871% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verra Mobility has a beta of 0.774, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.644%.

MMTEC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Verra Mobility offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MMTEC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Verra Mobility pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MMTEC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Verra Mobility quarterly revenues of $223.3M. MMTEC's net income of -- is lower than Verra Mobility's net income of $32.3M. Notably, MMTEC's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.42x while Verra Mobility's PE ratio is 123.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MMTEC is 22.20x versus 4.58x for Verra Mobility. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.