KALU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum has a net margin of 2.78% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of 4.69%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 6.41% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 18.99%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $69.00, signalling downside risk potential of -21.89%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $22.50 which suggests that it could grow by 15.21%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.285% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.547, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 154.749%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $777.4M, which are larger than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $633.9M. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $21.6M is lower than Century Aluminum's net income of $29.7M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.09x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 16.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.47x versus 0.80x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Calumet has a net margin of 2.78% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of -16.3%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 6.41% beat Calumet's return on equity of --.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $69.00, signalling downside risk potential of -21.89%. On the other hand Calumet has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.21%. Given that Calumet has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Calumet is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.285% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Calumet has a beta of 0.932, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.791%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. Calumet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Calumet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $777.4M, which are smaller than Calumet quarterly revenues of $993.9M. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $21.6M is higher than Calumet's net income of -$162M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.09x while Calumet's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.47x versus 0.33x for Calumet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Core Molding Technologies has a net margin of 2.78% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of 3.55%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 6.41% beat Core Molding Technologies's return on equity of 7.97%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $69.00, signalling downside risk potential of -21.89%. On the other hand Core Molding Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $22.00 which suggests that it could grow by 30.8%. Given that Core Molding Technologies has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Core Molding Technologies is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.285% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Core Molding Technologies has a beta of 0.812, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.839%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. Core Molding Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Core Molding Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $777.4M, which are larger than Core Molding Technologies quarterly revenues of $61.4M. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $21.6M is higher than Core Molding Technologies's net income of $2.2M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.09x while Core Molding Technologies's PE ratio is 12.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.47x versus 0.52x for Core Molding Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Green Plains has a net margin of 2.78% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of -12.12%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 6.41% beat Green Plains's return on equity of -11.81%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $69.00, signalling downside risk potential of -21.89%. On the other hand Green Plains has an analysts' consensus of $9.56 which suggests that it could grow by 22.99%. Given that Green Plains has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Green Plains is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.285% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Green Plains has a beta of 1.223, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.286%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. Green Plains offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Green Plains pays out -6.26% of its earnings as a dividend.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $777.4M, which are larger than Green Plains quarterly revenues of $601.5M. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $21.6M is higher than Green Plains's net income of -$72.9M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.09x while Green Plains's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.47x versus 0.21x for Green Plains. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.