CLMT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of -16.3% compared to Calumet's net margin of -10.69%. Calumet's return on equity of -- beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75%.

Calumet has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.21%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $9.07 which suggests that it could fall by -0.79%. Given that Calumet has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, analysts believe Calumet is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Calumet has a beta of 0.932, which suggesting that the stock is 6.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.908, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.847%.

Calumet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Calumet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Calumet quarterly revenues are $993.9M, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Calumet's net income of -$162M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M. Notably, Calumet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calumet is 0.33x versus 0.24x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Friedman Industries has a net margin of -16.3% compared to Calumet's net margin of 4.14%. Calumet's return on equity of -- beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.71%.

Calumet has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.21%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Calumet has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Calumet is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Calumet has a beta of 0.932, which suggesting that the stock is 6.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.485, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.545%.

Calumet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Calumet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 18.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Calumet quarterly revenues are $993.9M, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $129.2M. Calumet's net income of -$162M is lower than Friedman Industries's net income of $5.3M. Notably, Calumet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 18.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calumet is 0.33x versus 0.24x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -16.3% compared to Calumet's net margin of --. Calumet's return on equity of -- beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Calumet has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.21%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 149.19%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Calumet, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Calumet.

Calumet has a beta of 0.932, which suggesting that the stock is 6.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.135, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.451%.

Calumet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Calumet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Calumet quarterly revenues are $993.9M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Calumet's net income of -$162M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Calumet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calumet is 0.33x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of -16.3% compared to Calumet's net margin of --. Calumet's return on equity of -- beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Calumet has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.21%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 128.94%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Calumet, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Calumet.

Calumet has a beta of 0.932, which suggesting that the stock is 6.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.465, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.534%.

Calumet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Calumet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Calumet quarterly revenues are $993.9M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Calumet's net income of -$162M is lower than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, Calumet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calumet is 0.33x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.