HWKN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of 6.66% compared to Hawkins's net margin of -10.69%. Hawkins's return on equity of 19.28% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75%.

Hawkins has a consensus price target of $148.33, signalling downside risk potential of -7.21%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $9.07 which suggests that it could fall by -0.79%. Given that Hawkins has more downside risk than Cleveland-Cliffs, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Hawkins.

Hawkins has a beta of 0.852, which suggesting that the stock is 14.832% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.908, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.847%.

Hawkins has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hawkins pays 17.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hawkins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hawkins quarterly revenues are $245.3M, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Hawkins's net income of $16.3M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M. Notably, Hawkins's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.57x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hawkins is 3.43x versus 0.24x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intrepid Potash has a net margin of 6.66% compared to Hawkins's net margin of 4.71%. Hawkins's return on equity of 19.28% beat Intrepid Potash's return on equity of -34.2%.

Hawkins has a consensus price target of $148.33, signalling downside risk potential of -7.21%. On the other hand Intrepid Potash has an analysts' consensus of $21.00 which suggests that it could fall by -37.44%. Given that Intrepid Potash has more downside risk than Hawkins, analysts believe Hawkins is more attractive than Intrepid Potash.

Hawkins has a beta of 0.852, which suggesting that the stock is 14.832% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intrepid Potash has a beta of 1.723, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.304%.

Hawkins has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Intrepid Potash offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hawkins pays 17.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Intrepid Potash pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hawkins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hawkins quarterly revenues are $245.3M, which are larger than Intrepid Potash quarterly revenues of $97.8M. Hawkins's net income of $16.3M is higher than Intrepid Potash's net income of $4.6M. Notably, Hawkins's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.57x while Intrepid Potash's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hawkins is 3.43x versus 1.59x for Intrepid Potash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kronos Worldwide has a net margin of 6.66% compared to Hawkins's net margin of 3.7%. Hawkins's return on equity of 19.28% beat Kronos Worldwide's return on equity of 11.85%.

Hawkins has a consensus price target of $148.33, signalling downside risk potential of -7.21%. On the other hand Kronos Worldwide has an analysts' consensus of $8.75 which suggests that it could grow by 37.8%. Given that Kronos Worldwide has higher upside potential than Hawkins, analysts believe Kronos Worldwide is more attractive than Hawkins.

Hawkins has a beta of 0.852, which suggesting that the stock is 14.832% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kronos Worldwide has a beta of 1.116, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.649%.

Hawkins has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Kronos Worldwide offers a yield of 3.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Hawkins pays 17.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Kronos Worldwide pays out 64.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hawkins quarterly revenues are $245.3M, which are smaller than Kronos Worldwide quarterly revenues of $489.8M. Hawkins's net income of $16.3M is lower than Kronos Worldwide's net income of $18.1M. Notably, Hawkins's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.57x while Kronos Worldwide's PE ratio is 7.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hawkins is 3.43x versus 0.38x for Kronos Worldwide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 6.66% compared to Hawkins's net margin of 4.97%. Hawkins's return on equity of 19.28% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 13%.

Hawkins has a consensus price target of $148.33, signalling downside risk potential of -7.21%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $149.07 which suggests that it could grow by 16.94%. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than Hawkins, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than Hawkins.

Hawkins has a beta of 0.852, which suggesting that the stock is 14.832% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.370, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.988%.

Hawkins has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Hawkins pays 17.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hawkins quarterly revenues are $245.3M, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Hawkins's net income of $16.3M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $217.2M. Notably, Hawkins's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.57x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 16.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hawkins is 3.43x versus 1.14x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.