STLD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Commercial Metals has a net margin of 4.97% compared to Steel Dynamics's net margin of 4.12%. Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 13% beat Commercial Metals's return on equity of 0.89%.

Steel Dynamics has a consensus price target of $149.07, signalling upside risk potential of 16.94%. On the other hand Commercial Metals has an analysts' consensus of $55.23 which suggests that it could grow by 7.78%. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than Commercial Metals, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than Commercial Metals.

Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.370, which suggesting that the stock is 36.988% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.262, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.213%.

Steel Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Commercial Metals offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Steel Dynamics pays 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals pays out 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Commercial Metals quarterly revenues of $2B. Steel Dynamics's net income of $217.2M is higher than Commercial Metals's net income of $83.1M. Notably, Steel Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.84x while Commercial Metals's PE ratio is 165.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics is 1.14x versus 0.76x for Commercial Metals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 4.97% compared to Steel Dynamics's net margin of 4.14%. Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 13% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.71%.

Steel Dynamics has a consensus price target of $149.07, signalling upside risk potential of 16.94%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.370, which suggesting that the stock is 36.988% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.485, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.545%.

Steel Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Steel Dynamics pays 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 18.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $129.2M. Steel Dynamics's net income of $217.2M is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of $5.3M. Notably, Steel Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.84x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 18.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics is 1.14x versus 0.24x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor has a net margin of 4.97% compared to Steel Dynamics's net margin of 1.99%. Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 13% beat Nucor's return on equity of 6.22%.

Steel Dynamics has a consensus price target of $149.07, signalling upside risk potential of 16.94%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $149.99 which suggests that it could grow by 8.85%. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than Nucor, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than Nucor.

Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.370, which suggesting that the stock is 36.988% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.705, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.46%.

Steel Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Steel Dynamics pays 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 25.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Steel Dynamics's net income of $217.2M is higher than Nucor's net income of $156M. Notably, Steel Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.84x while Nucor's PE ratio is 24.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics is 1.14x versus 1.07x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.