FTEK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CECO Environmental has a net margin of -11.58% compared to Fuel Tech's net margin of 20.37%. Fuel Tech's return on equity of -6.9% beat CECO Environmental's return on equity of 18.77%.

Fuel Tech has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.38%. On the other hand CECO Environmental has an analysts' consensus of $34.33 which suggests that it could grow by 8.34%. Given that Fuel Tech has higher upside potential than CECO Environmental, analysts believe Fuel Tech is more attractive than CECO Environmental.

Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.559, which suggesting that the stock is 355.87% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CECO Environmental has a beta of 1.328, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.81%.

Fuel Tech has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CECO Environmental offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fuel Tech pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CECO Environmental pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fuel Tech quarterly revenues are $6.4M, which are smaller than CECO Environmental quarterly revenues of $176.7M. Fuel Tech's net income of -$739K is lower than CECO Environmental's net income of $36M. Notably, Fuel Tech's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CECO Environmental's PE ratio is 24.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fuel Tech is 3.07x versus 1.90x for CECO Environmental. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Donaldson has a net margin of -11.58% compared to Fuel Tech's net margin of 6.15%. Fuel Tech's return on equity of -6.9% beat Donaldson's return on equity of 24.08%.

Fuel Tech has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.38%. On the other hand Donaldson has an analysts' consensus of $72.35 which suggests that it could grow by 3.45%. Given that Fuel Tech has higher upside potential than Donaldson, analysts believe Fuel Tech is more attractive than Donaldson.

Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.559, which suggesting that the stock is 355.87% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Donaldson has a beta of 0.985, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.548%.

Fuel Tech has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Donaldson offers a yield of 1.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Fuel Tech pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson pays out 29.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fuel Tech quarterly revenues are $6.4M, which are smaller than Donaldson quarterly revenues of $940.1M. Fuel Tech's net income of -$739K is lower than Donaldson's net income of $57.8M. Notably, Fuel Tech's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Donaldson's PE ratio is 23.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fuel Tech is 3.07x versus 2.33x for Donaldson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a net margin of -11.58% compared to Fuel Tech's net margin of --. Fuel Tech's return on equity of -6.9% beat Kronos Advanced Technologies's return on equity of --.

Fuel Tech has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.38%. On the other hand Kronos Advanced Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13536.36%. Given that Kronos Advanced Technologies has higher upside potential than Fuel Tech, analysts believe Kronos Advanced Technologies is more attractive than Fuel Tech.

Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.559, which suggesting that the stock is 355.87% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kronos Advanced Technologies has a beta of 2.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.946%.

Fuel Tech has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kronos Advanced Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fuel Tech pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kronos Advanced Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fuel Tech quarterly revenues are $6.4M, which are larger than Kronos Advanced Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Fuel Tech's net income of -$739K is higher than Kronos Advanced Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Fuel Tech's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kronos Advanced Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fuel Tech is 3.07x versus -- for Kronos Advanced Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Limbach Holdings has a net margin of -11.58% compared to Fuel Tech's net margin of 7.67%. Fuel Tech's return on equity of -6.9% beat Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 23.42%.

Fuel Tech has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.38%. On the other hand Limbach Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $141.50 which suggests that it could fall by -1.35%. Given that Fuel Tech has higher upside potential than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe Fuel Tech is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.559, which suggesting that the stock is 355.87% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.187, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.681%.

Fuel Tech has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Limbach Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fuel Tech pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Limbach Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fuel Tech quarterly revenues are $6.4M, which are smaller than Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues of $133.1M. Fuel Tech's net income of -$739K is lower than Limbach Holdings's net income of $10.2M. Notably, Fuel Tech's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Limbach Holdings's PE ratio is 51.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fuel Tech is 3.07x versus 3.24x for Limbach Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.