DFLI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Preformed Line Products has a net margin of -50.89% compared to Dragonfly Energy Holdings's net margin of 7.75%. Dragonfly Energy Holdings's return on equity of -491.85% beat Preformed Line Products's return on equity of 9.22%.

Dragonfly Energy Holdings has a consensus price target of $2.25, signalling upside risk potential of 1325.86%. On the other hand Preformed Line Products has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Dragonfly Energy Holdings has higher upside potential than Preformed Line Products, analysts believe Dragonfly Energy Holdings is more attractive than Preformed Line Products.

Dragonfly Energy Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Preformed Line Products has a beta of 0.771, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.885%.

Dragonfly Energy Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Preformed Line Products offers a yield of 0.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Dragonfly Energy Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Preformed Line Products pays out 10.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Preformed Line Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dragonfly Energy Holdings quarterly revenues are $13.4M, which are smaller than Preformed Line Products quarterly revenues of $148.5M. Dragonfly Energy Holdings's net income of -$6.8M is lower than Preformed Line Products's net income of $11.5M. Notably, Dragonfly Energy Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Preformed Line Products's PE ratio is 19.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dragonfly Energy Holdings is 0.02x versus 1.29x for Preformed Line Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power has a net margin of -50.89% compared to Dragonfly Energy Holdings's net margin of -147.12%. Dragonfly Energy Holdings's return on equity of -491.85% beat Plug Power's return on equity of -79.04%.

Dragonfly Energy Holdings has a consensus price target of $2.25, signalling upside risk potential of 1325.86%. On the other hand Plug Power has an analysts' consensus of $1.85 which suggests that it could grow by 21.47%. Given that Dragonfly Energy Holdings has higher upside potential than Plug Power, analysts believe Dragonfly Energy Holdings is more attractive than Plug Power.

Dragonfly Energy Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power has a beta of 2.293, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 129.257%.

Dragonfly Energy Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plug Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dragonfly Energy Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dragonfly Energy Holdings quarterly revenues are $13.4M, which are smaller than Plug Power quarterly revenues of $133.7M. Dragonfly Energy Holdings's net income of -$6.8M is higher than Plug Power's net income of -$196.7M. Notably, Dragonfly Energy Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Plug Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dragonfly Energy Holdings is 0.02x versus 2.04x for Plug Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tecogen has a net margin of -50.89% compared to Dragonfly Energy Holdings's net margin of -9.07%. Dragonfly Energy Holdings's return on equity of -491.85% beat Tecogen's return on equity of -38.16%.

Dragonfly Energy Holdings has a consensus price target of $2.25, signalling upside risk potential of 1325.86%. On the other hand Tecogen has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -25.99%. Given that Dragonfly Energy Holdings has higher upside potential than Tecogen, analysts believe Dragonfly Energy Holdings is more attractive than Tecogen.

Dragonfly Energy Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tecogen has a beta of 0.990, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.02%.

Dragonfly Energy Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tecogen offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dragonfly Energy Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tecogen pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dragonfly Energy Holdings quarterly revenues are $13.4M, which are larger than Tecogen quarterly revenues of $7.3M. Dragonfly Energy Holdings's net income of -$6.8M is lower than Tecogen's net income of -$659.9K. Notably, Dragonfly Energy Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tecogen's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dragonfly Energy Holdings is 0.02x versus 6.38x for Tecogen. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ultralife has a net margin of -50.89% compared to Dragonfly Energy Holdings's net margin of 3.68%. Dragonfly Energy Holdings's return on equity of -491.85% beat Ultralife's return on equity of 3.96%.

Dragonfly Energy Holdings has a consensus price target of $2.25, signalling upside risk potential of 1325.86%. On the other hand Ultralife has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 62.79%. Given that Dragonfly Energy Holdings has higher upside potential than Ultralife, analysts believe Dragonfly Energy Holdings is more attractive than Ultralife.

Dragonfly Energy Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ultralife has a beta of 0.995, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.474%.

Dragonfly Energy Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ultralife offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dragonfly Energy Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ultralife pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dragonfly Energy Holdings quarterly revenues are $13.4M, which are smaller than Ultralife quarterly revenues of $50.7M. Dragonfly Energy Holdings's net income of -$6.8M is lower than Ultralife's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Dragonfly Energy Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ultralife's PE ratio is 26.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dragonfly Energy Holdings is 0.02x versus 0.83x for Ultralife. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.