CRUS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Atomera has a net margin of 16.79% compared to Cirrus Logic's net margin of -130225%. Cirrus Logic's return on equity of 17.44% beat Atomera's return on equity of -93.98%.

Cirrus Logic has a consensus price target of $123.19, signalling upside risk potential of 19.16%. On the other hand Atomera has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could grow by 55.34%. Given that Atomera has higher upside potential than Cirrus Logic, analysts believe Atomera is more attractive than Cirrus Logic.

Cirrus Logic has a beta of 0.946, which suggesting that the stock is 5.385% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atomera has a beta of 1.240, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.99%.

Cirrus Logic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Atomera offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cirrus Logic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Atomera pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cirrus Logic quarterly revenues are $424.5M, which are larger than Atomera quarterly revenues of $4K. Cirrus Logic's net income of $71.3M is higher than Atomera's net income of -$5.2M. Notably, Cirrus Logic's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.20x while Atomera's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cirrus Logic is 3.01x versus 1,203.06x for Atomera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IPG Photonics has a net margin of 16.79% compared to Cirrus Logic's net margin of 1.65%. Cirrus Logic's return on equity of 17.44% beat IPG Photonics's return on equity of -9.35%.

Cirrus Logic has a consensus price target of $123.19, signalling upside risk potential of 19.16%. On the other hand IPG Photonics has an analysts' consensus of $66.40 which suggests that it could fall by -9.82%. Given that Cirrus Logic has higher upside potential than IPG Photonics, analysts believe Cirrus Logic is more attractive than IPG Photonics.

Cirrus Logic has a beta of 0.946, which suggesting that the stock is 5.385% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IPG Photonics has a beta of 0.900, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.957%.

Cirrus Logic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IPG Photonics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cirrus Logic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IPG Photonics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cirrus Logic quarterly revenues are $424.5M, which are larger than IPG Photonics quarterly revenues of $227.8M. Cirrus Logic's net income of $71.3M is higher than IPG Photonics's net income of $3.8M. Notably, Cirrus Logic's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.20x while IPG Photonics's PE ratio is 22.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cirrus Logic is 3.01x versus 3.37x for IPG Photonics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lattice Semiconductor has a net margin of 16.79% compared to Cirrus Logic's net margin of 4.18%. Cirrus Logic's return on equity of 17.44% beat Lattice Semiconductor's return on equity of 7.33%.

Cirrus Logic has a consensus price target of $123.19, signalling upside risk potential of 19.16%. On the other hand Lattice Semiconductor has an analysts' consensus of $63.07 which suggests that it could grow by 21.41%. Given that Lattice Semiconductor has higher upside potential than Cirrus Logic, analysts believe Lattice Semiconductor is more attractive than Cirrus Logic.

Cirrus Logic has a beta of 0.946, which suggesting that the stock is 5.385% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lattice Semiconductor has a beta of 1.522, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.162%.

Cirrus Logic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lattice Semiconductor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cirrus Logic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lattice Semiconductor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cirrus Logic quarterly revenues are $424.5M, which are larger than Lattice Semiconductor quarterly revenues of $120.2M. Cirrus Logic's net income of $71.3M is higher than Lattice Semiconductor's net income of $5M. Notably, Cirrus Logic's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.20x while Lattice Semiconductor's PE ratio is 140.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cirrus Logic is 3.01x versus 14.69x for Lattice Semiconductor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 16.79% compared to Cirrus Logic's net margin of 42.61%. Cirrus Logic's return on equity of 17.44% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12%.

Cirrus Logic has a consensus price target of $123.19, signalling upside risk potential of 19.16%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $179.06 which suggests that it could grow by 4.49%. Given that Cirrus Logic has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Cirrus Logic is more attractive than NVIDIA.

Cirrus Logic has a beta of 0.946, which suggesting that the stock is 5.385% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.014%.

Cirrus Logic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Cirrus Logic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cirrus Logic quarterly revenues are $424.5M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $44.1B. Cirrus Logic's net income of $71.3M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B. Notably, Cirrus Logic's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.20x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 55.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cirrus Logic is 3.01x versus 28.54x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.