AIOT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Data Storage has a net margin of -12% compared to PowerFleet's net margin of 0.3%. PowerFleet's return on equity of -13.53% beat Data Storage's return on equity of 0.92%.

PowerFleet has a consensus price target of $10.33, signalling upside risk potential of 134.85%. On the other hand Data Storage has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 69.81%. Given that PowerFleet has higher upside potential than Data Storage, analysts believe PowerFleet is more attractive than Data Storage.

PowerFleet has a beta of 1.320, which suggesting that the stock is 31.989% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Data Storage has a beta of 1.194, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.353%.

PowerFleet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Data Storage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PowerFleet pays -177.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Data Storage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PowerFleet quarterly revenues are $103.6M, which are larger than Data Storage quarterly revenues of $8.1M. PowerFleet's net income of -$12.4M is lower than Data Storage's net income of $24.1K. Notably, PowerFleet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Data Storage's PE ratio is 265.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PowerFleet is 1.45x versus 1.54x for Data Storage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intellinetics has a net margin of -12% compared to PowerFleet's net margin of -17.13%. PowerFleet's return on equity of -13.53% beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -10.61%.

PowerFleet has a consensus price target of $10.33, signalling upside risk potential of 134.85%. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $16.50 which suggests that it could grow by 22.68%. Given that PowerFleet has higher upside potential than Intellinetics, analysts believe PowerFleet is more attractive than Intellinetics.

PowerFleet has a beta of 1.320, which suggesting that the stock is 31.989% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.510, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.997%.

PowerFleet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PowerFleet pays -177.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PowerFleet quarterly revenues are $103.6M, which are larger than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.2M. PowerFleet's net income of -$12.4M is lower than Intellinetics's net income of -$727.6K. Notably, PowerFleet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 248.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PowerFleet is 1.45x versus 3.30x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Signing Day Sports has a net margin of -12% compared to PowerFleet's net margin of -568.22%. PowerFleet's return on equity of -13.53% beat Signing Day Sports's return on equity of --.

PowerFleet has a consensus price target of $10.33, signalling upside risk potential of 134.85%. On the other hand Signing Day Sports has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PowerFleet has higher upside potential than Signing Day Sports, analysts believe PowerFleet is more attractive than Signing Day Sports.

PowerFleet has a beta of 1.320, which suggesting that the stock is 31.989% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Signing Day Sports has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PowerFleet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Signing Day Sports offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PowerFleet pays -177.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Signing Day Sports pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PowerFleet quarterly revenues are $103.6M, which are larger than Signing Day Sports quarterly revenues of $148.4K. PowerFleet's net income of -$12.4M is lower than Signing Day Sports's net income of -$843K. Notably, PowerFleet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Signing Day Sports's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PowerFleet is 1.45x versus 3.68x for Signing Day Sports. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of -12% compared to PowerFleet's net margin of -2.12%. PowerFleet's return on equity of -13.53% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -14.61%.

PowerFleet has a consensus price target of $10.33, signalling upside risk potential of 134.85%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 135.85%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than PowerFleet, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than PowerFleet.

PowerFleet has a beta of 1.320, which suggesting that the stock is 31.989% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.603, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.329%.

PowerFleet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PowerFleet pays -177.1% of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PowerFleet quarterly revenues are $103.6M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.2M. PowerFleet's net income of -$12.4M is lower than WidePoint's net income of -$724.1K. Notably, PowerFleet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PowerFleet is 1.45x versus 0.21x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.