ACIW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 14.92% compared to ACI Worldwide's net margin of 22.02%. ACI Worldwide's return on equity of 20.04% beat Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 24.76%.

ACI Worldwide has a consensus price target of $61.96, signalling upside risk potential of 39.98%. On the other hand Cadence Design Systems has an analysts' consensus of $328.11 which suggests that it could grow by 2.26%. Given that ACI Worldwide has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, analysts believe ACI Worldwide is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems.

ACI Worldwide has a beta of 1.058, which suggesting that the stock is 5.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 0.988, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.194%.

ACI Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cadence Design Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ACI Worldwide pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cadence Design Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ACI Worldwide quarterly revenues are $394.6M, which are smaller than Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues of $1.2B. ACI Worldwide's net income of $58.9M is lower than Cadence Design Systems's net income of $273.6M. Notably, ACI Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.00x while Cadence Design Systems's PE ratio is 81.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ACI Worldwide is 2.91x versus 18.03x for Cadence Design Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shift4 Payments has a net margin of 14.92% compared to ACI Worldwide's net margin of 1.97%. ACI Worldwide's return on equity of 20.04% beat Shift4 Payments's return on equity of 22.86%.

ACI Worldwide has a consensus price target of $61.96, signalling upside risk potential of 39.98%. On the other hand Shift4 Payments has an analysts' consensus of $116.55 which suggests that it could grow by 9.84%. Given that ACI Worldwide has higher upside potential than Shift4 Payments, analysts believe ACI Worldwide is more attractive than Shift4 Payments.

ACI Worldwide has a beta of 1.058, which suggesting that the stock is 5.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shift4 Payments has a beta of 1.805, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.453%.

ACI Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shift4 Payments offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ACI Worldwide pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shift4 Payments pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ACI Worldwide quarterly revenues are $394.6M, which are smaller than Shift4 Payments quarterly revenues of $848.3M. ACI Worldwide's net income of $58.9M is higher than Shift4 Payments's net income of $16.7M. Notably, ACI Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.00x while Shift4 Payments's PE ratio is 35.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ACI Worldwide is 2.91x versus 2.62x for Shift4 Payments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intuit has a net margin of 14.92% compared to ACI Worldwide's net margin of 36.37%. ACI Worldwide's return on equity of 20.04% beat Intuit's return on equity of 18.57%.

ACI Worldwide has a consensus price target of $61.96, signalling upside risk potential of 39.98%. On the other hand Intuit has an analysts' consensus of $804.19 which suggests that it could grow by 7.14%. Given that ACI Worldwide has higher upside potential than Intuit, analysts believe ACI Worldwide is more attractive than Intuit.

ACI Worldwide has a beta of 1.058, which suggesting that the stock is 5.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intuit has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.481%.

ACI Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intuit offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. ACI Worldwide pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit pays out 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ACI Worldwide quarterly revenues are $394.6M, which are smaller than Intuit quarterly revenues of $7.8B. ACI Worldwide's net income of $58.9M is lower than Intuit's net income of $2.8B. Notably, ACI Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.00x while Intuit's PE ratio is 61.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ACI Worldwide is 2.91x versus 11.76x for Intuit. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 14.92% compared to ACI Worldwide's net margin of 36.86%. ACI Worldwide's return on equity of 20.04% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

ACI Worldwide has a consensus price target of $61.96, signalling upside risk potential of 39.98%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $536.53 which suggests that it could grow by 4.85%. Given that ACI Worldwide has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe ACI Worldwide is more attractive than Microsoft.

ACI Worldwide has a beta of 1.058, which suggesting that the stock is 5.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.675%.

ACI Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. ACI Worldwide pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ACI Worldwide quarterly revenues are $394.6M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. ACI Worldwide's net income of $58.9M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, ACI Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.00x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 39.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ACI Worldwide is 2.91x versus 14.15x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.