Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…
Sell
46
TRI.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$288.99
Seasonality move
:
0.05%
Day range:
$284.09 - $290.40
52-week range:
$214.51 - $299.24
Dividend yield:
1.1%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
15.73x
P/B ratio:
8.07x
Volume:
521.9K
Avg. volume:
329.4K
1-year change:
28.08%
Market cap:
$136.1B
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TRI.TO
Thomson Reuters
|
$2.5B | $1.15 | 6.85% | -40.09% | $266.98 |
|
BAC.CX
Bactech Environmental
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DOCT.CX
Republic Technologies
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LUX.CX
Newlox Gold Ventures
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PKG.CX
ParcelPal Logistics
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SHRC.CX
Sharc International Systems
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TRI.TO
Thomson Reuters
|
$288.99 | $266.98 | $136.1B | -- | $0.83 | 1.1% | 15.73x |
|
BAC.CX
Bactech Environmental
|
$0.0400 | -- | $8.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
DOCT.CX
Republic Technologies
|
$0.72 | -- | $23.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
LUX.CX
Newlox Gold Ventures
|
$0.0550 | -- | $8.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 5.76x |
|
PKG.CX
ParcelPal Logistics
|
$0.02 | -- | $466.3K | -- | $7,612,115.00 | 0% | 0.03x |
|
SHRC.CX
Sharc International Systems
|
$0.08 | -- | $12.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 4.95x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TRI.TO
Thomson Reuters
|
-- | 0.118 | -- | -- |
|
BAC.CX
Bactech Environmental
|
-- | -0.494 | -- | -- |
|
DOCT.CX
Republic Technologies
|
-- | 6.326 | -- | -- |
|
LUX.CX
Newlox Gold Ventures
|
109.52% | 0.182 | 27.54% | 0.01x |
|
PKG.CX
ParcelPal Logistics
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SHRC.CX
Sharc International Systems
|
168.61% | 4.819 | 11.11% | 0.61x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TRI.TO
Thomson Reuters
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BAC.CX
Bactech Environmental
|
-- | -$290.5K | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DOCT.CX
Republic Technologies
|
-- | -$95.6K | -- | -- | -- | -$35.5K |
|
LUX.CX
Newlox Gold Ventures
|
-$7.3K | -$789.6K | -105.09% | -438.68% | -421.99% | -$34.2K |
|
PKG.CX
ParcelPal Logistics
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SHRC.CX
Sharc International Systems
|
$315.7K | -$832.8K | -210.38% | -461.69% | -82.15% | -$439.9K |
Thomson Reuters vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns TRI.TO or BAC.CX?
Bactech Environmental has a net margin of -- compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of --. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of -- beat Bactech Environmental's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TRI.TOThomson Reuters-- -- -- BAC.CXBactech Environmental-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TRI.TO or BAC.CX?
Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $266.98, signalling downside risk potential of -7.62%. On the other hand Bactech Environmental has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Thomson Reuters has higher upside potential than Bactech Environmental, analysts believe Thomson Reuters is more attractive than Bactech Environmental.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TRI.TOThomson Reuters2 11 3 BAC.CXBactech Environmental0 0 0 -
Is TRI.TO or BAC.CX More Risky?
Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.453, which suggesting that the stock is 54.655% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bactech Environmental has a beta of 0.988, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.222%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRI.TO or BAC.CX?
Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Bactech Environmental offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thomson Reuters pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bactech Environmental pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TRI.TO or BAC.CX?
Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bactech Environmental quarterly revenues of --. Thomson Reuters's net income of -- is lower than Bactech Environmental's net income of -$470.2K. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bactech Environmental's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 15.73x versus -- for Bactech Environmental. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TRI.TOThomson Reuters15.73x -- -- -- BAC.CXBactech Environmental-- -- -- -$470.2K
-
Which has Higher Returns TRI.TO or DOCT.CX?
Republic Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of --. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of -- beat Republic Technologies's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TRI.TOThomson Reuters-- -- -- DOCT.CXRepublic Technologies-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TRI.TO or DOCT.CX?
Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $266.98, signalling downside risk potential of -7.62%. On the other hand Republic Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Thomson Reuters has higher upside potential than Republic Technologies, analysts believe Thomson Reuters is more attractive than Republic Technologies.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TRI.TOThomson Reuters2 11 3 DOCT.CXRepublic Technologies0 0 0 -
Is TRI.TO or DOCT.CX More Risky?
Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.453, which suggesting that the stock is 54.655% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Republic Technologies has a beta of 2.133, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.276%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRI.TO or DOCT.CX?
Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Republic Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thomson Reuters pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Republic Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TRI.TO or DOCT.CX?
Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Republic Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Thomson Reuters's net income of -- is lower than Republic Technologies's net income of -$32.5K. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Republic Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 15.73x versus -- for Republic Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TRI.TOThomson Reuters15.73x -- -- -- DOCT.CXRepublic Technologies-- -- -- -$32.5K
-
Which has Higher Returns TRI.TO or LUX.CX?
Newlox Gold Ventures has a net margin of -- compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of -536.54%. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of -- beat Newlox Gold Ventures's return on equity of -438.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TRI.TOThomson Reuters-- -- -- LUX.CXNewlox Gold Ventures-3.87% -$0.01 $3.9M -
What do Analysts Say About TRI.TO or LUX.CX?
Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $266.98, signalling downside risk potential of -7.62%. On the other hand Newlox Gold Ventures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Thomson Reuters has higher upside potential than Newlox Gold Ventures, analysts believe Thomson Reuters is more attractive than Newlox Gold Ventures.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TRI.TOThomson Reuters2 11 3 LUX.CXNewlox Gold Ventures0 0 0 -
Is TRI.TO or LUX.CX More Risky?
Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.453, which suggesting that the stock is 54.655% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newlox Gold Ventures has a beta of 2.473, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 147.324%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRI.TO or LUX.CX?
Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Newlox Gold Ventures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thomson Reuters pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Newlox Gold Ventures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TRI.TO or LUX.CX?
Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Newlox Gold Ventures quarterly revenues of $188.4K. Thomson Reuters's net income of -- is lower than Newlox Gold Ventures's net income of -$1M. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Newlox Gold Ventures's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 15.73x versus 5.76x for Newlox Gold Ventures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TRI.TOThomson Reuters15.73x -- -- -- LUX.CXNewlox Gold Ventures5.76x -- $188.4K -$1M
-
Which has Higher Returns TRI.TO or PKG.CX?
ParcelPal Logistics has a net margin of -- compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of --. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of -- beat ParcelPal Logistics's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TRI.TOThomson Reuters-- -- -- PKG.CXParcelPal Logistics-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TRI.TO or PKG.CX?
Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $266.98, signalling downside risk potential of -7.62%. On the other hand ParcelPal Logistics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Thomson Reuters has higher upside potential than ParcelPal Logistics, analysts believe Thomson Reuters is more attractive than ParcelPal Logistics.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TRI.TOThomson Reuters2 11 3 PKG.CXParcelPal Logistics0 0 0 -
Is TRI.TO or PKG.CX More Risky?
Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.453, which suggesting that the stock is 54.655% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ParcelPal Logistics has a beta of -34,193,366.785, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3419336778.479%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRI.TO or PKG.CX?
Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. ParcelPal Logistics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $7,612,115.00 per share. Thomson Reuters pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ParcelPal Logistics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TRI.TO or PKG.CX?
Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ParcelPal Logistics quarterly revenues of --. Thomson Reuters's net income of -- is lower than ParcelPal Logistics's net income of --. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ParcelPal Logistics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 15.73x versus 0.03x for ParcelPal Logistics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TRI.TOThomson Reuters15.73x -- -- -- PKG.CXParcelPal Logistics0.03x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TRI.TO or SHRC.CX?
Sharc International Systems has a net margin of -- compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of -90.38%. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of -- beat Sharc International Systems's return on equity of -461.69%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TRI.TOThomson Reuters-- -- -- SHRC.CXSharc International Systems31.17% -$0.01 $1M -
What do Analysts Say About TRI.TO or SHRC.CX?
Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $266.98, signalling downside risk potential of -7.62%. On the other hand Sharc International Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Thomson Reuters has higher upside potential than Sharc International Systems, analysts believe Thomson Reuters is more attractive than Sharc International Systems.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TRI.TOThomson Reuters2 11 3 SHRC.CXSharc International Systems0 0 0 -
Is TRI.TO or SHRC.CX More Risky?
Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.453, which suggesting that the stock is 54.655% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sharc International Systems has a beta of 1.085, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.534%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRI.TO or SHRC.CX?
Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Sharc International Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thomson Reuters pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sharc International Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TRI.TO or SHRC.CX?
Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sharc International Systems quarterly revenues of $1M. Thomson Reuters's net income of -- is lower than Sharc International Systems's net income of -$915.5K. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sharc International Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 15.73x versus 4.95x for Sharc International Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TRI.TOThomson Reuters15.73x -- -- -- SHRC.CXSharc International Systems4.95x -- $1M -$915.5K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Can Levi Stock Double?
Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…
How High Can SharkNinja Stock Go?
If you know popular consumer appliance brands Shark and Ninja,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 58x
Buy
62
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
82
SBET alert for Jul 17
SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 4.98% over the past day.
Buy
89
EXOD alert for Jul 17
Exodus Movement [EXOD] is down 0.73% over the past day.
Sell
42
VLCN alert for Jul 17
Volcon [VLCN] is up 229.89% over the past day.
