WAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Delcath Systems has a net margin of 18.34% compared to Waters's net margin of 5.4%. Waters's return on equity of 40.75% beat Delcath Systems's return on equity of -40.28%.

Waters has a consensus price target of $379.71, signalling upside risk potential of 31.13%. On the other hand Delcath Systems has an analysts' consensus of $24.08 which suggests that it could grow by 114.03%. Given that Delcath Systems has higher upside potential than Waters, analysts believe Delcath Systems is more attractive than Waters.

Waters has a beta of 1.099, which suggesting that the stock is 9.856% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Delcath Systems has a beta of 0.871, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.874%.

Waters has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Delcath Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waters pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Delcath Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Waters quarterly revenues are $661.7M, which are larger than Delcath Systems quarterly revenues of $19.8M. Waters's net income of $121.4M is higher than Delcath Systems's net income of $1.1M. Notably, Waters's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.28x while Delcath Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waters is 5.79x versus 6.91x for Delcath Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Danaher has a net margin of 18.34% compared to Waters's net margin of 16.62%. Waters's return on equity of 40.75% beat Danaher's return on equity of 7.38%.

Waters has a consensus price target of $379.71, signalling upside risk potential of 31.13%. On the other hand Danaher has an analysts' consensus of $248.27 which suggests that it could grow by 28.44%. Given that Waters has higher upside potential than Danaher, analysts believe Waters is more attractive than Danaher.

Waters has a beta of 1.099, which suggesting that the stock is 9.856% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Danaher has a beta of 0.772, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.82%.

Waters has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Danaher offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Waters pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Danaher pays out 19.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Danaher's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Waters quarterly revenues are $661.7M, which are smaller than Danaher quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Waters's net income of $121.4M is lower than Danaher's net income of $954M. Notably, Waters's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.28x while Danaher's PE ratio is 37.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waters is 5.79x versus 5.93x for Danaher. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mettler-Toledo International has a net margin of 18.34% compared to Waters's net margin of 18.51%. Waters's return on equity of 40.75% beat Mettler-Toledo International's return on equity of --.

Waters has a consensus price target of $379.71, signalling upside risk potential of 31.13%. On the other hand Mettler-Toledo International has an analysts' consensus of $1,260.09 which suggests that it could grow by 6.41%. Given that Waters has higher upside potential than Mettler-Toledo International, analysts believe Waters is more attractive than Mettler-Toledo International.

Waters has a beta of 1.099, which suggesting that the stock is 9.856% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mettler-Toledo International has a beta of 1.371, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.104%.

Waters has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mettler-Toledo International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waters pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mettler-Toledo International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Waters quarterly revenues are $661.7M, which are smaller than Mettler-Toledo International quarterly revenues of $883.7M. Waters's net income of $121.4M is lower than Mettler-Toledo International's net income of $163.6M. Notably, Waters's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.28x while Mettler-Toledo International's PE ratio is 29.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waters is 5.79x versus 6.54x for Mettler-Toledo International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Star Equity Holdings has a net margin of 18.34% compared to Waters's net margin of -9.1%. Waters's return on equity of 40.75% beat Star Equity Holdings's return on equity of -15.99%.

Waters has a consensus price target of $379.71, signalling upside risk potential of 31.13%. On the other hand Star Equity Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $8.50 which suggests that it could grow by 331.47%. Given that Star Equity Holdings has higher upside potential than Waters, analysts believe Star Equity Holdings is more attractive than Waters.

Waters has a beta of 1.099, which suggesting that the stock is 9.856% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Star Equity Holdings has a beta of 0.934, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.616%.

Waters has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Star Equity Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waters pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Star Equity Holdings pays out -19.54% of its earnings as a dividend.

Waters quarterly revenues are $661.7M, which are larger than Star Equity Holdings quarterly revenues of $12.9M. Waters's net income of $121.4M is higher than Star Equity Holdings's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Waters's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.28x while Star Equity Holdings's PE ratio is 0.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waters is 5.79x versus 0.11x for Star Equity Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.