VZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Alphabet has a net margin of 14.57% compared to Verizon Communications's net margin of 38.28%. Verizon Communications's return on equity of 18.02% beat Alphabet's return on equity of 35.17%.

Verizon Communications has a consensus price target of $48.45, signalling upside risk potential of 17.45%. On the other hand Alphabet has an analysts' consensus of $203.51 which suggests that it could grow by 11.23%. Given that Verizon Communications has higher upside potential than Alphabet, analysts believe Verizon Communications is more attractive than Alphabet.

Verizon Communications has a beta of 0.375, which suggesting that the stock is 62.498% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alphabet has a beta of 1.002, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.23200000000001%.

Verizon Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.57%. Alphabet offers a yield of 0.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Verizon Communications pays 64.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Alphabet pays out 7.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Verizon Communications quarterly revenues are $33.5B, which are smaller than Alphabet quarterly revenues of $90.2B. Verizon Communications's net income of $4.9B is lower than Alphabet's net income of $34.5B. Notably, Verizon Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.82x while Alphabet's PE ratio is 20.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verizon Communications is 1.29x versus 6.29x for Alphabet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Netflix has a net margin of 14.57% compared to Verizon Communications's net margin of 27.42%. Verizon Communications's return on equity of 18.02% beat Netflix's return on equity of 40.31%.

Verizon Communications has a consensus price target of $48.45, signalling upside risk potential of 17.45%. On the other hand Netflix has an analysts' consensus of $1,231.31 which suggests that it could fall by -1.52%. Given that Verizon Communications has higher upside potential than Netflix, analysts believe Verizon Communications is more attractive than Netflix.

Verizon Communications has a beta of 0.375, which suggesting that the stock is 62.498% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Netflix has a beta of 1.593, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.312%.

Verizon Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.57%. Netflix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Verizon Communications pays 64.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Netflix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Verizon Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Verizon Communications quarterly revenues are $33.5B, which are larger than Netflix quarterly revenues of $10.5B. Verizon Communications's net income of $4.9B is higher than Netflix's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Verizon Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.82x while Netflix's PE ratio is 59.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verizon Communications is 1.29x versus 13.63x for Netflix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EchoStar has a net margin of 14.57% compared to Verizon Communications's net margin of -5.24%. Verizon Communications's return on equity of 18.02% beat EchoStar's return on equity of -1.08%.

Verizon Communications has a consensus price target of $48.45, signalling upside risk potential of 17.45%. On the other hand EchoStar has an analysts' consensus of $40.36 which suggests that it could grow by 38.73%. Given that EchoStar has higher upside potential than Verizon Communications, analysts believe EchoStar is more attractive than Verizon Communications.

Verizon Communications has a beta of 0.375, which suggesting that the stock is 62.498% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EchoStar has a beta of 0.900, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.023%.

Verizon Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.57%. EchoStar offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Verizon Communications pays 64.26% of its earnings as a dividend. EchoStar pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Verizon Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Verizon Communications quarterly revenues are $33.5B, which are larger than EchoStar quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Verizon Communications's net income of $4.9B is higher than EchoStar's net income of -$202.7M. Notably, Verizon Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.82x while EchoStar's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verizon Communications is 1.29x versus 0.52x for EchoStar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

T-Mobile US has a net margin of 14.57% compared to Verizon Communications's net margin of 14.14%. Verizon Communications's return on equity of 18.02% beat T-Mobile US's return on equity of 19.11%.

Verizon Communications has a consensus price target of $48.45, signalling upside risk potential of 17.45%. On the other hand T-Mobile US has an analysts' consensus of $266.08 which suggests that it could grow by 16.33%. Given that Verizon Communications has higher upside potential than T-Mobile US, analysts believe Verizon Communications is more attractive than T-Mobile US.

Verizon Communications has a beta of 0.375, which suggesting that the stock is 62.498% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison T-Mobile US has a beta of 0.618, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.192%.

Verizon Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.57%. T-Mobile US offers a yield of 1.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. Verizon Communications pays 64.26% of its earnings as a dividend. T-Mobile US pays out 29.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Verizon Communications quarterly revenues are $33.5B, which are larger than T-Mobile US quarterly revenues of $20.9B. Verizon Communications's net income of $4.9B is higher than T-Mobile US's net income of $3B. Notably, Verizon Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.82x while T-Mobile US's PE ratio is 22.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verizon Communications is 1.29x versus 3.21x for T-Mobile US. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.