SLB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Halliburton has a net margin of 9.39% compared to SLB's net margin of 3.77%. SLB's return on equity of 19.04% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 20.56%.

SLB has a consensus price target of $46.70, signalling upside risk potential of 35.02%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $28.78 which suggests that it could grow by 35.51%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than SLB, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than SLB.

SLB has a beta of 1.009, which suggesting that the stock is 0.91399999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.907%.

SLB has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. Halliburton offers a yield of 3.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. SLB pays 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SLB quarterly revenues are $8.5B, which are larger than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.4B. SLB's net income of $797M is higher than Halliburton's net income of $204M. Notably, SLB's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.73x while Halliburton's PE ratio is 8.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SLB is 1.36x versus 0.83x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hess has a net margin of 9.39% compared to SLB's net margin of 14.77%. SLB's return on equity of 19.04% beat Hess's return on equity of 19.29%.

SLB has a consensus price target of $46.70, signalling upside risk potential of 35.02%. On the other hand Hess has an analysts' consensus of $158.57 which suggests that it could grow by 7.47%. Given that SLB has higher upside potential than Hess, analysts believe SLB is more attractive than Hess.

SLB has a beta of 1.009, which suggesting that the stock is 0.91399999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hess has a beta of 0.619, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.054%.

SLB has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. Hess offers a yield of 1.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. SLB pays 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Hess pays out 20.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SLB quarterly revenues are $8.5B, which are larger than Hess quarterly revenues of $2.9B. SLB's net income of $797M is higher than Hess's net income of $430M. Notably, SLB's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.73x while Hess's PE ratio is 20.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SLB is 1.36x versus 3.64x for Hess. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oceaneering International has a net margin of 9.39% compared to SLB's net margin of 7.47%. SLB's return on equity of 19.04% beat Oceaneering International's return on equity of 26.18%.

SLB has a consensus price target of $46.70, signalling upside risk potential of 35.02%. On the other hand Oceaneering International has an analysts' consensus of $21.25 which suggests that it could grow by 3.76%. Given that SLB has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, analysts believe SLB is more attractive than Oceaneering International.

SLB has a beta of 1.009, which suggesting that the stock is 0.91399999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oceaneering International has a beta of 1.483, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.256%.

SLB has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. Oceaneering International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SLB pays 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Oceaneering International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SLB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SLB quarterly revenues are $8.5B, which are larger than Oceaneering International quarterly revenues of $674.5M. SLB's net income of $797M is higher than Oceaneering International's net income of $50.4M. Notably, SLB's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.73x while Oceaneering International's PE ratio is 11.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SLB is 1.36x versus 0.77x for Oceaneering International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 9.39% compared to SLB's net margin of 9.52%. SLB's return on equity of 19.04% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 12.7%.

SLB has a consensus price target of $46.70, signalling upside risk potential of 35.02%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $124.49 which suggests that it could grow by 10.93%. Given that SLB has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe SLB is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

SLB has a beta of 1.009, which suggesting that the stock is 0.91399999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.499, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.08%.

SLB has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. SLB pays 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SLB quarterly revenues are $8.5B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. SLB's net income of $797M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.7B. Notably, SLB's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.73x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 14.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SLB is 1.36x versus 1.45x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.