SCHW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Robinhood Markets has a net margin of 34.1% compared to Charles Schwab's net margin of 36.25%. Charles Schwab's return on equity of 14.02% beat Robinhood Markets's return on equity of 21.41%.

Charles Schwab has a consensus price target of $100.53, signalling upside risk potential of 10.15%. On the other hand Robinhood Markets has an analysts' consensus of $95.57 which suggests that it could fall by -7.44%. Given that Charles Schwab has higher upside potential than Robinhood Markets, analysts believe Charles Schwab is more attractive than Robinhood Markets.

Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.935, which suggesting that the stock is 6.506% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robinhood Markets has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Charles Schwab has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.14%. Robinhood Markets offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Charles Schwab pays 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Robinhood Markets pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Charles Schwab's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Charles Schwab quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Robinhood Markets quarterly revenues of $927M. Charles Schwab's net income of $1.9B is higher than Robinhood Markets's net income of $336M. Notably, Charles Schwab's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.65x while Robinhood Markets's PE ratio is 58.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Charles Schwab is 8.17x versus 29.15x for Robinhood Markets. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Interactive Brokers Group has a net margin of 34.1% compared to Charles Schwab's net margin of 9.22%. Charles Schwab's return on equity of 14.02% beat Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.96%.

Charles Schwab has a consensus price target of $100.53, signalling upside risk potential of 10.15%. On the other hand Interactive Brokers Group has an analysts' consensus of $61.89 which suggests that it could grow by 4.1%. Given that Charles Schwab has higher upside potential than Interactive Brokers Group, analysts believe Charles Schwab is more attractive than Interactive Brokers Group.

Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.935, which suggesting that the stock is 6.506% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 1.247, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.677%.

Charles Schwab has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.14%. Interactive Brokers Group offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Charles Schwab pays 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Interactive Brokers Group pays out 12.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Charles Schwab quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Charles Schwab's net income of $1.9B is higher than Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $213M. Notably, Charles Schwab's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.65x while Interactive Brokers Group's PE ratio is 32.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Charles Schwab is 8.17x versus 4.58x for Interactive Brokers Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LPL Financial Holdings has a net margin of 34.1% compared to Charles Schwab's net margin of 8.68%. Charles Schwab's return on equity of 14.02% beat LPL Financial Holdings's return on equity of 39.98%.

Charles Schwab has a consensus price target of $100.53, signalling upside risk potential of 10.15%. On the other hand LPL Financial Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $433.77 which suggests that it could grow by 17.77%. Given that LPL Financial Holdings has higher upside potential than Charles Schwab, analysts believe LPL Financial Holdings is more attractive than Charles Schwab.

Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.935, which suggesting that the stock is 6.506% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LPL Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.638, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.16%.

Charles Schwab has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.14%. LPL Financial Holdings offers a yield of 0.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Charles Schwab pays 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. LPL Financial Holdings pays out 8.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Charles Schwab quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than LPL Financial Holdings quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Charles Schwab's net income of $1.9B is higher than LPL Financial Holdings's net income of $318.6M. Notably, Charles Schwab's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.65x while LPL Financial Holdings's PE ratio is 25.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Charles Schwab is 8.17x versus 2.10x for LPL Financial Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morgan Stanley has a net margin of 34.1% compared to Charles Schwab's net margin of 26.13%. Charles Schwab's return on equity of 14.02% beat Morgan Stanley's return on equity of 13.75%.

Charles Schwab has a consensus price target of $100.53, signalling upside risk potential of 10.15%. On the other hand Morgan Stanley has an analysts' consensus of $138.77 which suggests that it could fall by -0.84%. Given that Charles Schwab has higher upside potential than Morgan Stanley, analysts believe Charles Schwab is more attractive than Morgan Stanley.

Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.935, which suggesting that the stock is 6.506% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.299, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.914%.

Charles Schwab has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.14%. Morgan Stanley offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share. Charles Schwab pays 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Morgan Stanley pays out 45.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Charles Schwab quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are smaller than Morgan Stanley quarterly revenues of $16.5B. Charles Schwab's net income of $1.9B is lower than Morgan Stanley's net income of $4.3B. Notably, Charles Schwab's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.65x while Morgan Stanley's PE ratio is 16.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Charles Schwab is 8.17x versus 3.75x for Morgan Stanley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.