OI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of -1.02% compared to O-I Glass's net margin of 2.27%. O-I Glass's return on equity of -13.06% beat Bassett Furniture Industries's return on equity of 1.48%.

O-I Glass has a consensus price target of $17.60, signalling upside risk potential of 21.88%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2.7%. Given that O-I Glass has higher upside potential than Bassett Furniture Industries, analysts believe O-I Glass is more attractive than Bassett Furniture Industries.

O-I Glass has a beta of 0.969, which suggesting that the stock is 3.075% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.192, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.183%.

O-I Glass has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bassett Furniture Industries offers a yield of 4.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. O-I Glass pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out -68.63% of its earnings as a dividend.

O-I Glass quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Bassett Furniture Industries quarterly revenues of $84.3M. O-I Glass's net income of -$16M is lower than Bassett Furniture Industries's net income of $1.9M. Notably, O-I Glass's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bassett Furniture Industries's PE ratio is 63.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for O-I Glass is 0.34x versus 0.49x for Bassett Furniture Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a net margin of -1.02% compared to O-I Glass's net margin of -2.54%. O-I Glass's return on equity of -13.06% beat Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of -22.04%.

O-I Glass has a consensus price target of $17.60, signalling upside risk potential of 21.88%. On the other hand Commercial Vehicle Group has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 112.77%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than O-I Glass, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than O-I Glass.

O-I Glass has a beta of 0.969, which suggesting that the stock is 3.075% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 2.081, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.11%.

O-I Glass has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commercial Vehicle Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. O-I Glass pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Vehicle Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

O-I Glass quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues of $169.8M. O-I Glass's net income of -$16M is lower than Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of -$4.3M. Notably, O-I Glass's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Commercial Vehicle Group's PE ratio is 1.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for O-I Glass is 0.34x versus 0.09x for Commercial Vehicle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -1.02% compared to O-I Glass's net margin of -3528.43%. O-I Glass's return on equity of -13.06% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

O-I Glass has a consensus price target of $17.60, signalling upside risk potential of 21.88%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.58%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than O-I Glass, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than O-I Glass.

O-I Glass has a beta of 0.969, which suggesting that the stock is 3.075% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.586, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 158.605%.

O-I Glass has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. O-I Glass pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

O-I Glass quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. O-I Glass's net income of -$16M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, O-I Glass's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for O-I Glass is 0.34x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of -1.02% compared to O-I Glass's net margin of --. O-I Glass's return on equity of -13.06% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

O-I Glass has a consensus price target of $17.60, signalling upside risk potential of 21.88%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that O-I Glass has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe O-I Glass is more attractive than Northann.

O-I Glass has a beta of 0.969, which suggesting that the stock is 3.075% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

O-I Glass has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. O-I Glass pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

O-I Glass quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. O-I Glass's net income of -$16M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, O-I Glass's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for O-I Glass is 0.34x versus 0.32x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.