MSI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BK Technologies has a net margin of 17.01% compared to Motorola Solutions's net margin of 11.19%. Motorola Solutions's return on equity of 168.45% beat BK Technologies's return on equity of 36.85%.

Motorola Solutions has a consensus price target of $493.31, signalling upside risk potential of 18.5%. On the other hand BK Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $55.00 which suggests that it could grow by 35.47%. Given that BK Technologies has higher upside potential than Motorola Solutions, analysts believe BK Technologies is more attractive than Motorola Solutions.

Motorola Solutions has a beta of 0.949, which suggesting that the stock is 5.082% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BK Technologies has a beta of 0.321, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.873%.

Motorola Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $1.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.02%. BK Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Motorola Solutions pays 41.47% of its earnings as a dividend. BK Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Motorola Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Motorola Solutions quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than BK Technologies quarterly revenues of $19.1M. Motorola Solutions's net income of $430M is higher than BK Technologies's net income of $2.1M. Notably, Motorola Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.75x while BK Technologies's PE ratio is 15.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Motorola Solutions is 6.48x versus 1.99x for BK Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Comtech Telecommunications has a net margin of 17.01% compared to Motorola Solutions's net margin of 26.77%. Motorola Solutions's return on equity of 168.45% beat Comtech Telecommunications's return on equity of -66.89%.

Motorola Solutions has a consensus price target of $493.31, signalling upside risk potential of 18.5%. On the other hand Comtech Telecommunications has an analysts' consensus of $4.50 which suggests that it could grow by 77.87%. Given that Comtech Telecommunications has higher upside potential than Motorola Solutions, analysts believe Comtech Telecommunications is more attractive than Motorola Solutions.

Motorola Solutions has a beta of 0.949, which suggesting that the stock is 5.082% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comtech Telecommunications has a beta of 1.244, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.383%.

Motorola Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $1.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.02%. Comtech Telecommunications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Motorola Solutions pays 41.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Comtech Telecommunications pays out -0.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Motorola Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Motorola Solutions quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Comtech Telecommunications quarterly revenues of $126.8M. Motorola Solutions's net income of $430M is higher than Comtech Telecommunications's net income of $33.9M. Notably, Motorola Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.75x while Comtech Telecommunications's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Motorola Solutions is 6.48x versus 0.15x for Comtech Telecommunications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Harmonic has a net margin of 17.01% compared to Motorola Solutions's net margin of 4.46%. Motorola Solutions's return on equity of 168.45% beat Harmonic's return on equity of 12.43%.

Motorola Solutions has a consensus price target of $493.31, signalling upside risk potential of 18.5%. On the other hand Harmonic has an analysts' consensus of $10.93 which suggests that it could grow by 19.83%. Given that Harmonic has higher upside potential than Motorola Solutions, analysts believe Harmonic is more attractive than Motorola Solutions.

Motorola Solutions has a beta of 0.949, which suggesting that the stock is 5.082% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harmonic has a beta of 1.045, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.533%.

Motorola Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $1.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.02%. Harmonic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Motorola Solutions pays 41.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Harmonic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Motorola Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Motorola Solutions quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Harmonic quarterly revenues of $133.1M. Motorola Solutions's net income of $430M is higher than Harmonic's net income of $5.9M. Notably, Motorola Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.75x while Harmonic's PE ratio is 20.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Motorola Solutions is 6.48x versus 1.54x for Harmonic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Viavi Solutions has a net margin of 17.01% compared to Motorola Solutions's net margin of 6.85%. Motorola Solutions's return on equity of 168.45% beat Viavi Solutions's return on equity of 0.73%.

Motorola Solutions has a consensus price target of $493.31, signalling upside risk potential of 18.5%. On the other hand Viavi Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $12.26 which suggests that it could grow by 21.29%. Given that Viavi Solutions has higher upside potential than Motorola Solutions, analysts believe Viavi Solutions is more attractive than Motorola Solutions.

Motorola Solutions has a beta of 0.949, which suggesting that the stock is 5.082% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Viavi Solutions has a beta of 0.882, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.807%.

Motorola Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $1.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.02%. Viavi Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Motorola Solutions pays 41.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Viavi Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Motorola Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Motorola Solutions quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Viavi Solutions quarterly revenues of $284.8M. Motorola Solutions's net income of $430M is higher than Viavi Solutions's net income of $19.5M. Notably, Motorola Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.75x while Viavi Solutions's PE ratio is 505.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Motorola Solutions is 6.48x versus 2.17x for Viavi Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.