LMT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Dynamics has a net margin of 9.53% compared to Lockheed Martin's net margin of 8.13%. Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 83.28% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.96%.

Lockheed Martin has a consensus price target of $524.72, signalling upside risk potential of 11.29%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $305.31 which suggests that it could grow by 1.77%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than General Dynamics.

Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.280, which suggesting that the stock is 71.965% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.465, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.462%.

Lockheed Martin has a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.77%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Lockheed Martin pays 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues are $18B, which are larger than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $12.2B. Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.7B is higher than General Dynamics's net income of $994M. Notably, Lockheed Martin's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.37x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 20.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lockheed Martin is 1.56x versus 1.69x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 9.53% compared to Lockheed Martin's net margin of 19.91%. Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 83.28% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 32.36%.

Lockheed Martin has a consensus price target of $524.72, signalling upside risk potential of 11.29%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $260.71 which suggests that it could fall by -2.05%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than GE Aerospace, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than GE Aerospace.

Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.280, which suggesting that the stock is 71.965% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.376, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.616%.

Lockheed Martin has a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.77%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Lockheed Martin pays 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 15.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues are $18B, which are larger than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $9.9B. Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.7B is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $2B. Notably, Lockheed Martin's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.37x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 41.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lockheed Martin is 1.56x versus 7.30x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rocket Lab USA has a net margin of 9.53% compared to Lockheed Martin's net margin of -49.46%. Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 83.28% beat Rocket Lab USA's return on equity of -47.64%.

Lockheed Martin has a consensus price target of $524.72, signalling upside risk potential of 11.29%. On the other hand Rocket Lab USA has an analysts' consensus of $36.96 which suggests that it could fall by -22.51%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than Rocket Lab USA, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than Rocket Lab USA.

Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.280, which suggesting that the stock is 71.965% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rocket Lab USA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lockheed Martin has a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.77%. Rocket Lab USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lockheed Martin pays 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Rocket Lab USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues are $18B, which are larger than Rocket Lab USA quarterly revenues of $122.6M. Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.7B is higher than Rocket Lab USA's net income of -$60.6M. Notably, Lockheed Martin's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.37x while Rocket Lab USA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lockheed Martin is 1.56x versus 51.15x for Rocket Lab USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 9.53% compared to Lockheed Martin's net margin of 7.56%. Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 83.28% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.4%.

Lockheed Martin has a consensus price target of $524.72, signalling upside risk potential of 11.29%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $148.93 which suggests that it could fall by -0.83%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than RTX.

Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.280, which suggesting that the stock is 71.965% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.640, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.001%.

Lockheed Martin has a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.77%. RTX offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Lockheed Martin pays 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues are $18B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.3B. Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.7B is higher than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Lockheed Martin's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.37x while RTX's PE ratio is 44.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lockheed Martin is 1.56x versus 2.48x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.