INTC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of -6.48% compared to Intel's net margin of 9.53%. Intel's return on equity of -17.53% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 3.91%.

Intel has a consensus price target of $21.52, signalling downside risk potential of -5.16%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $143.78 which suggests that it could fall by -10.18%. Given that Advanced Micro Devices has more downside risk than Intel, analysts believe Intel is more attractive than Advanced Micro Devices.

Intel has a beta of 1.154, which suggesting that the stock is 15.352% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 2.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.692%.

Intel has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.2%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intel pays -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intel quarterly revenues are $12.7B, which are larger than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Intel's net income of -$821M is lower than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $709M. Notably, Intel's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.83x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 117.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intel is 1.84x versus 9.42x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of -6.48% compared to Intel's net margin of 35.53%. Intel's return on equity of -17.53% beat KLA's return on equity of 104.91%.

Intel has a consensus price target of $21.52, signalling downside risk potential of -5.16%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $830.45 which suggests that it could fall by -11.04%. Given that KLA has more downside risk than Intel, analysts believe Intel is more attractive than KLA.

Intel has a beta of 1.154, which suggesting that the stock is 15.352% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.423, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.272%.

Intel has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.2%. KLA offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. Intel pays -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intel quarterly revenues are $12.7B, which are larger than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Intel's net income of -$821M is lower than KLA's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Intel's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.83x while KLA's PE ratio is 33.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intel is 1.84x versus 10.86x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microchip Technology has a net margin of -6.48% compared to Intel's net margin of -15.93%. Intel's return on equity of -17.53% beat Microchip Technology's return on equity of -0.01%.

Intel has a consensus price target of $21.52, signalling downside risk potential of -5.16%. On the other hand Microchip Technology has an analysts' consensus of $71.93 which suggests that it could fall by -3.36%. Given that Intel has more downside risk than Microchip Technology, analysts believe Microchip Technology is more attractive than Intel.

Intel has a beta of 1.154, which suggesting that the stock is 15.352% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microchip Technology has a beta of 1.519, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.855%.

Intel has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.2%. Microchip Technology offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Intel pays -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Microchip Technology pays out -195140% of its earnings as a dividend.

Intel quarterly revenues are $12.7B, which are larger than Microchip Technology quarterly revenues of $970.5M. Intel's net income of -$821M is lower than Microchip Technology's net income of -$154.6M. Notably, Intel's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.83x while Microchip Technology's PE ratio is 87.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intel is 1.84x versus 9.13x for Microchip Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of -6.48% compared to Intel's net margin of 9.39%. Intel's return on equity of -17.53% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -3.57%.

Intel has a consensus price target of $21.52, signalling downside risk potential of -5.16%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $90.27 which suggests that it could grow by 27.41%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Intel.

Intel has a beta of 1.154, which suggesting that the stock is 15.352% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.814, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.355%.

Intel has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.2%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Intel pays -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend.

Intel quarterly revenues are $12.7B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Intel's net income of -$821M is lower than Marvell Technology's net income of $177.9M. Notably, Intel's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.83x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intel is 1.84x versus 9.46x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.