FFIV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GitLab has a net margin of 19.91% compared to F5's net margin of -16.72%. F5's return on equity of 19.89% beat GitLab's return on equity of 1.66%.

F5 has a consensus price target of $296.93, signalling upside risk potential of 1.3%. On the other hand GitLab has an analysts' consensus of $62.88 which suggests that it could grow by 47.72%. Given that GitLab has higher upside potential than F5, analysts believe GitLab is more attractive than F5.

F5 has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.083999999999995% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GitLab has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

F5 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GitLab offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F5 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GitLab pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

F5 quarterly revenues are $731.1M, which are larger than GitLab quarterly revenues of $214.5M. F5's net income of $145.5M is higher than GitLab's net income of -$35.9M. Notably, F5's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.81x while GitLab's PE ratio is 425.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F5 is 5.88x versus 8.75x for GitLab. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies has a net margin of 19.91% compared to F5's net margin of 24.22%. F5's return on equity of 19.89% beat Palantir Technologies's return on equity of 12.3%.

F5 has a consensus price target of $296.93, signalling upside risk potential of 1.3%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $104.96 which suggests that it could fall by -30.45%. Given that F5 has higher upside potential than Palantir Technologies, analysts believe F5 is more attractive than Palantir Technologies.

F5 has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.083999999999995% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

F5 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palantir Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F5 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

F5 quarterly revenues are $731.1M, which are smaller than Palantir Technologies quarterly revenues of $883.9M. F5's net income of $145.5M is lower than Palantir Technologies's net income of $214M. Notably, F5's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.81x while Palantir Technologies's PE ratio is 656.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F5 is 5.88x versus 120.58x for Palantir Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SoundHound AI has a net margin of 19.91% compared to F5's net margin of -748.63%. F5's return on equity of 19.89% beat SoundHound AI's return on equity of -74.79%.

F5 has a consensus price target of $296.93, signalling upside risk potential of 1.3%. On the other hand SoundHound AI has an analysts' consensus of $11.81 which suggests that it could grow by 0.28%. Given that F5 has higher upside potential than SoundHound AI, analysts believe F5 is more attractive than SoundHound AI.

F5 has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.083999999999995% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SoundHound AI has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

F5 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SoundHound AI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F5 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SoundHound AI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

F5 quarterly revenues are $731.1M, which are larger than SoundHound AI quarterly revenues of $29.1M. F5's net income of $145.5M is higher than SoundHound AI's net income of $129.9M. Notably, F5's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.81x while SoundHound AI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F5 is 5.88x versus 42.69x for SoundHound AI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zscaler has a net margin of 19.91% compared to F5's net margin of -0.61%. F5's return on equity of 19.89% beat Zscaler's return on equity of -2.69%.

F5 has a consensus price target of $296.93, signalling upside risk potential of 1.3%. On the other hand Zscaler has an analysts' consensus of $315.17 which suggests that it could grow by 9.53%. Given that Zscaler has higher upside potential than F5, analysts believe Zscaler is more attractive than F5.

F5 has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.083999999999995% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zscaler has a beta of 1.108, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.848%.

F5 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zscaler offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F5 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zscaler pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

F5 quarterly revenues are $731.1M, which are larger than Zscaler quarterly revenues of $678M. F5's net income of $145.5M is higher than Zscaler's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, F5's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.81x while Zscaler's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F5 is 5.88x versus 17.31x for Zscaler. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.