EQT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chevron has a net margin of 10.01% compared to EQT's net margin of 7.59%. EQT's return on equity of 1.86% beat Chevron's return on equity of 10.01%.

EQT has a consensus price target of $61.15, signalling upside risk potential of 3.32%. On the other hand Chevron has an analysts' consensus of $164.40 which suggests that it could grow by 9.66%. Given that Chevron has higher upside potential than EQT, analysts believe Chevron is more attractive than EQT.

EQT has a beta of 0.654, which suggesting that the stock is 34.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron has a beta of 0.830, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.023%.

EQT has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. Chevron offers a yield of 4.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. EQT pays 141.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron pays out 66.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but EQT's is not.

EQT quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Chevron quarterly revenues of $46.1B. EQT's net income of $242.1M is lower than Chevron's net income of $3.5B. Notably, EQT's price-to-earnings ratio is 103.82x while Chevron's PE ratio is 17.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT is 5.20x versus 1.39x for Chevron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expand Energy has a net margin of 10.01% compared to EQT's net margin of -11.34%. EQT's return on equity of 1.86% beat Expand Energy's return on equity of -7.49%.

EQT has a consensus price target of $61.15, signalling upside risk potential of 3.32%. On the other hand Expand Energy has an analysts' consensus of $131.85 which suggests that it could grow by 21.73%. Given that Expand Energy has higher upside potential than EQT, analysts believe Expand Energy is more attractive than EQT.

EQT has a beta of 0.654, which suggesting that the stock is 34.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expand Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

EQT has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. Expand Energy offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. EQT pays 141.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Expand Energy pays out -54.34% of its earnings as a dividend.

EQT quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Expand Energy quarterly revenues of $2.2B. EQT's net income of $242.1M is higher than Expand Energy's net income of -$249M. Notably, EQT's price-to-earnings ratio is 103.82x while Expand Energy's PE ratio is 63.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT is 5.20x versus 3.71x for Expand Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Range Resources has a net margin of 10.01% compared to EQT's net margin of 11.47%. EQT's return on equity of 1.86% beat Range Resources's return on equity of 6.98%.

EQT has a consensus price target of $61.15, signalling upside risk potential of 3.32%. On the other hand Range Resources has an analysts' consensus of $42.21 which suggests that it could grow by 11.44%. Given that Range Resources has higher upside potential than EQT, analysts believe Range Resources is more attractive than EQT.

EQT has a beta of 0.654, which suggesting that the stock is 34.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Range Resources has a beta of 0.633, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.745%.

EQT has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. Range Resources offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. EQT pays 141.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Range Resources pays out 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Range Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but EQT's is not.

EQT quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Range Resources quarterly revenues of $846.3M. EQT's net income of $242.1M is higher than Range Resources's net income of $97.1M. Notably, EQT's price-to-earnings ratio is 103.82x while Range Resources's PE ratio is 33.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT is 5.20x versus 3.54x for Range Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 10.01% compared to EQT's net margin of 9.52%. EQT's return on equity of 1.86% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 12.7%.

EQT has a consensus price target of $61.15, signalling upside risk potential of 3.32%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $124.49 which suggests that it could grow by 10.93%. Given that Exxon Mobil has higher upside potential than EQT, analysts believe Exxon Mobil is more attractive than EQT.

EQT has a beta of 0.654, which suggesting that the stock is 34.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.499, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.08%.

EQT has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. EQT pays 141.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but EQT's is not.

EQT quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. EQT's net income of $242.1M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.7B. Notably, EQT's price-to-earnings ratio is 103.82x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 14.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT is 5.20x versus 1.45x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.