BXP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Prologis has a net margin of 7.07% compared to BXP's net margin of 27.71%. BXP's return on equity of -0.06% beat Prologis's return on equity of 6.45%.

BXP has a consensus price target of $77.17, signalling upside risk potential of 10.08%. On the other hand Prologis has an analysts' consensus of $118.65 which suggests that it could grow by 7.7%. Given that BXP has higher upside potential than Prologis, analysts believe BXP is more attractive than Prologis.

BXP has a beta of 1.152, which suggesting that the stock is 15.202% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prologis has a beta of 1.232, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.179%.

BXP has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.59%. Prologis offers a yield of 3.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. BXP pays 4833.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis pays out 95.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but BXP's is not.

BXP quarterly revenues are $865.2M, which are smaller than Prologis quarterly revenues of $2.1B. BXP's net income of $61.2M is lower than Prologis's net income of $593M. Notably, BXP's price-to-earnings ratio is 637.30x while Prologis's PE ratio is 27.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BXP is 3.23x versus 12.54x for Prologis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regency Centers has a net margin of 7.07% compared to BXP's net margin of 28.77%. BXP's return on equity of -0.06% beat Regency Centers's return on equity of 5.74%.

BXP has a consensus price target of $77.17, signalling upside risk potential of 10.08%. On the other hand Regency Centers has an analysts' consensus of $79.15 which suggests that it could grow by 14%. Given that Regency Centers has higher upside potential than BXP, analysts believe Regency Centers is more attractive than BXP.

BXP has a beta of 1.152, which suggesting that the stock is 15.202% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regency Centers has a beta of 1.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.0059999999999949%.

BXP has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.59%. Regency Centers offers a yield of 4.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. BXP pays 4833.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Regency Centers pays out 125.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BXP quarterly revenues are $865.2M, which are larger than Regency Centers quarterly revenues of $380.9M. BXP's net income of $61.2M is lower than Regency Centers's net income of $109.6M. Notably, BXP's price-to-earnings ratio is 637.30x while Regency Centers's PE ratio is 32.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BXP is 3.23x versus 8.61x for Regency Centers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SL Green Realty has a net margin of 7.07% compared to BXP's net margin of -6.33%. BXP's return on equity of -0.06% beat SL Green Realty's return on equity of -0.08%.

BXP has a consensus price target of $77.17, signalling upside risk potential of 10.08%. On the other hand SL Green Realty has an analysts' consensus of $62.67 which suggests that it could fall by -1.95%. Given that BXP has higher upside potential than SL Green Realty, analysts believe BXP is more attractive than SL Green Realty.

BXP has a beta of 1.152, which suggesting that the stock is 15.202% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SL Green Realty has a beta of 1.640, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.039%.

BXP has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.59%. SL Green Realty offers a yield of 4.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. BXP pays 4833.73% of its earnings as a dividend. SL Green Realty pays out 713.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BXP quarterly revenues are $865.2M, which are larger than SL Green Realty quarterly revenues of $239.8M. BXP's net income of $61.2M is higher than SL Green Realty's net income of -$15.2M. Notably, BXP's price-to-earnings ratio is 637.30x while SL Green Realty's PE ratio is 654.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BXP is 3.23x versus 4.65x for SL Green Realty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ventas has a net margin of 7.07% compared to BXP's net margin of 3.45%. BXP's return on equity of -0.06% beat Ventas's return on equity of 1.36%.

BXP has a consensus price target of $77.17, signalling upside risk potential of 10.08%. On the other hand Ventas has an analysts' consensus of $75.72 which suggests that it could grow by 15.61%. Given that Ventas has higher upside potential than BXP, analysts believe Ventas is more attractive than BXP.

BXP has a beta of 1.152, which suggesting that the stock is 15.202% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ventas has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.226%.

BXP has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.59%. Ventas offers a yield of 2.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. BXP pays 4833.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Ventas pays out 912.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BXP quarterly revenues are $865.2M, which are smaller than Ventas quarterly revenues of $1.4B. BXP's net income of $61.2M is higher than Ventas's net income of $46.9M. Notably, BXP's price-to-earnings ratio is 637.30x while Ventas's PE ratio is 198.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BXP is 3.23x versus 5.49x for Ventas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.