WOLTF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Airbus SE has a net margin of -- compared to Wolters Kluwer NV's net margin of 5.86%. Wolters Kluwer NV's return on equity of 63.81% beat Airbus SE's return on equity of 22.94%.

Wolters Kluwer NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Airbus SE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Wolters Kluwer NV has higher upside potential than Airbus SE, analysts believe Wolters Kluwer NV is more attractive than Airbus SE.

Wolters Kluwer NV has a beta of 0.308, which suggesting that the stock is 69.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Airbus SE has a beta of 1.309, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.946%.

Wolters Kluwer NV has a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. Airbus SE offers a yield of 1.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Wolters Kluwer NV pays 48.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Airbus SE pays out 52.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wolters Kluwer NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Airbus SE quarterly revenues of $14.2B. Wolters Kluwer NV's net income of -- is lower than Airbus SE's net income of $834.4M. Notably, Wolters Kluwer NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.03x while Airbus SE's PE ratio is 35.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wolters Kluwer NV is 6.02x versus 2.24x for Airbus SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICTS International NV has a net margin of -- compared to Wolters Kluwer NV's net margin of --. Wolters Kluwer NV's return on equity of 63.81% beat ICTS International NV's return on equity of 5.54%.

Wolters Kluwer NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ICTS International NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Wolters Kluwer NV has higher upside potential than ICTS International NV, analysts believe Wolters Kluwer NV is more attractive than ICTS International NV.

Wolters Kluwer NV has a beta of 0.308, which suggesting that the stock is 69.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICTS International NV has a beta of 0.636, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.404%.

Wolters Kluwer NV has a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. ICTS International NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Wolters Kluwer NV pays 48.29% of its earnings as a dividend. ICTS International NV pays out -76.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolters Kluwer NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wolters Kluwer NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ICTS International NV quarterly revenues of --. Wolters Kluwer NV's net income of -- is lower than ICTS International NV's net income of --. Notably, Wolters Kluwer NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.03x while ICTS International NV's PE ratio is 43.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wolters Kluwer NV is 6.02x versus 0.30x for ICTS International NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Randstad NV has a net margin of -- compared to Wolters Kluwer NV's net margin of 1.4%. Wolters Kluwer NV's return on equity of 63.81% beat Randstad NV's return on equity of 2.84%.

Wolters Kluwer NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Randstad NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Wolters Kluwer NV has higher upside potential than Randstad NV, analysts believe Wolters Kluwer NV is more attractive than Randstad NV.

Wolters Kluwer NV has a beta of 0.308, which suggesting that the stock is 69.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Randstad NV has a beta of 1.031, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.087%.

Wolters Kluwer NV has a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. Randstad NV offers a yield of 3.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. Wolters Kluwer NV pays 48.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Randstad NV pays out 516.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolters Kluwer NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Randstad NV's is not.

Wolters Kluwer NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Randstad NV quarterly revenues of $6B. Wolters Kluwer NV's net income of -- is lower than Randstad NV's net income of $83.1M. Notably, Wolters Kluwer NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.03x while Randstad NV's PE ratio is 73.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wolters Kluwer NV is 6.02x versus 0.33x for Randstad NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.