SZKMY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Linkage Global has a net margin of 6.6% compared to Suzuki Motor's net margin of --. Suzuki Motor's return on equity of 11.97% beat Linkage Global's return on equity of -42.09%.

Suzuki Motor has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Linkage Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Suzuki Motor has higher upside potential than Linkage Global, analysts believe Suzuki Motor is more attractive than Linkage Global.

Suzuki Motor has a beta of 0.596, which suggesting that the stock is 40.38% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Linkage Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Suzuki Motor has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.5%. Linkage Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Suzuki Motor pays 17.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Linkage Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Suzuki Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Suzuki Motor quarterly revenues are $9.4B, which are larger than Linkage Global quarterly revenues of --. Suzuki Motor's net income of $617.9M is higher than Linkage Global's net income of --. Notably, Suzuki Motor's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.79x while Linkage Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Suzuki Motor is 0.56x versus 0.76x for Linkage Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has a net margin of 6.6% compared to Suzuki Motor's net margin of --. Suzuki Motor's return on equity of 11.97% beat MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies's return on equity of --.

Suzuki Motor has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $4.98 which suggests that it could grow by 258.59%. Given that MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has higher upside potential than Suzuki Motor, analysts believe MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies is more attractive than Suzuki Motor.

Suzuki Motor has a beta of 0.596, which suggesting that the stock is 40.38% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Suzuki Motor has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.5%. MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Suzuki Motor pays 17.04% of its earnings as a dividend. MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Suzuki Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Suzuki Motor quarterly revenues are $9.4B, which are larger than MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Suzuki Motor's net income of $617.9M is higher than MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Suzuki Motor's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.79x while MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies's PE ratio is 7.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Suzuki Motor is 0.56x versus 0.15x for MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nissan Motor has a net margin of 6.6% compared to Suzuki Motor's net margin of -0.45%. Suzuki Motor's return on equity of 11.97% beat Nissan Motor's return on equity of -10.99%.

Suzuki Motor has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nissan Motor has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.82%. Given that Nissan Motor has higher upside potential than Suzuki Motor, analysts believe Nissan Motor is more attractive than Suzuki Motor.

Suzuki Motor has a beta of 0.596, which suggesting that the stock is 40.38% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nissan Motor has a beta of 0.772, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.85%.

Suzuki Motor has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.5%. Nissan Motor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Suzuki Motor pays 17.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Nissan Motor pays out -8.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Suzuki Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Suzuki Motor quarterly revenues are $9.4B, which are smaller than Nissan Motor quarterly revenues of $20.7B. Suzuki Motor's net income of $617.9M is higher than Nissan Motor's net income of -$92.3M. Notably, Suzuki Motor's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.79x while Nissan Motor's PE ratio is 4.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Suzuki Motor is 0.56x versus 0.09x for Nissan Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tokyo Lifestyle has a net margin of 6.6% compared to Suzuki Motor's net margin of --. Suzuki Motor's return on equity of 11.97% beat Tokyo Lifestyle's return on equity of -1.49%.

Suzuki Motor has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tokyo Lifestyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Suzuki Motor has higher upside potential than Tokyo Lifestyle, analysts believe Suzuki Motor is more attractive than Tokyo Lifestyle.

Suzuki Motor has a beta of 0.596, which suggesting that the stock is 40.38% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tokyo Lifestyle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Suzuki Motor has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.5%. Tokyo Lifestyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Suzuki Motor pays 17.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Tokyo Lifestyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Suzuki Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Suzuki Motor quarterly revenues are $9.4B, which are larger than Tokyo Lifestyle quarterly revenues of --. Suzuki Motor's net income of $617.9M is higher than Tokyo Lifestyle's net income of --. Notably, Suzuki Motor's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.79x while Tokyo Lifestyle's PE ratio is 2.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Suzuki Motor is 0.56x versus 0.09x for Tokyo Lifestyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.