SGSOY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aebi Schmidt Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to SGS AG's net margin of 0.83%. SGS AG's return on equity of -- beat Aebi Schmidt Holding AG's return on equity of --.

SGS AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Aebi Schmidt Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SGS AG has higher upside potential than Aebi Schmidt Holding AG, analysts believe SGS AG is more attractive than Aebi Schmidt Holding AG.

SGS AG has a beta of 0.758, which suggesting that the stock is 24.211% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aebi Schmidt Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

SGS AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Aebi Schmidt Holding AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SGS AG pays 106.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Aebi Schmidt Holding AG pays out 10.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Aebi Schmidt Holding AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SGS AG's is not.

SGS AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Aebi Schmidt Holding AG quarterly revenues of $277M. SGS AG's net income of -- is lower than Aebi Schmidt Holding AG's net income of $2.3M. Notably, SGS AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.06x while Aebi Schmidt Holding AG's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SGS AG is 2.77x versus -- for Aebi Schmidt Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Geberit AG has a net margin of -- compared to SGS AG's net margin of --. SGS AG's return on equity of -- beat Geberit AG's return on equity of 46.4%.

SGS AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Geberit AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SGS AG has higher upside potential than Geberit AG, analysts believe SGS AG is more attractive than Geberit AG.

SGS AG has a beta of 0.758, which suggesting that the stock is 24.211% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Geberit AG has a beta of 1.068, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.795%.

SGS AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Geberit AG offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share. SGS AG pays 106.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Geberit AG pays out 70.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Geberit AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SGS AG's is not.

SGS AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Geberit AG quarterly revenues of --. SGS AG's net income of -- is lower than Geberit AG's net income of --. Notably, SGS AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.06x while Geberit AG's PE ratio is 38.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SGS AG is 2.77x versus 7.36x for Geberit AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kuehne + Nagel International AG has a net margin of -- compared to SGS AG's net margin of 4.6%. SGS AG's return on equity of -- beat Kuehne + Nagel International AG's return on equity of 39.49%.

SGS AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kuehne + Nagel International AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SGS AG has higher upside potential than Kuehne + Nagel International AG, analysts believe SGS AG is more attractive than Kuehne + Nagel International AG.

SGS AG has a beta of 0.758, which suggesting that the stock is 24.211% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kuehne + Nagel International AG has a beta of 0.935, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.458%.

SGS AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Kuehne + Nagel International AG offers a yield of 4.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.96 per share. SGS AG pays 106.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Kuehne + Nagel International AG pays out 100.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SGS AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kuehne + Nagel International AG quarterly revenues of $7B. SGS AG's net income of -- is lower than Kuehne + Nagel International AG's net income of $323.5M. Notably, SGS AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.06x while Kuehne + Nagel International AG's PE ratio is 18.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SGS AG is 2.77x versus 0.88x for Kuehne + Nagel International AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schindler Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to SGS AG's net margin of 9.41%. SGS AG's return on equity of -- beat Schindler Holding AG's return on equity of 21.17%.

SGS AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Schindler Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SGS AG has higher upside potential than Schindler Holding AG, analysts believe SGS AG is more attractive than Schindler Holding AG.

SGS AG has a beta of 0.758, which suggesting that the stock is 24.211% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schindler Holding AG has a beta of 0.805, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.504%.

SGS AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Schindler Holding AG offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $6.78 per share. SGS AG pays 106.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Schindler Holding AG pays out 56.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Schindler Holding AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SGS AG's is not.

SGS AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Schindler Holding AG quarterly revenues of $3B. SGS AG's net income of -- is lower than Schindler Holding AG's net income of $285.7M. Notably, SGS AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.06x while Schindler Holding AG's PE ratio is 37.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SGS AG is 2.77x versus 3.40x for Schindler Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.