Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Buy
57
PIAIF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$6.65
Seasonality move
:
-0.91%
Day range:
$6.65 - $6.65
52-week range:
$4.05 - $7.82
Dividend yield:
8.54%
P/E ratio:
7.47x
P/S ratio:
1.20x
P/B ratio:
0.94x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
12.5K
1-year change:
49.43%
Market cap:
$121B
Revenue:
$103.8B
EPS (TTM):
$0.89
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PIAIF
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DXF
Dunxin Financial Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LX
LexinFintech Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $11.55 |
|
NCTY
The9
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PT
Pintec Technology Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PIAIF
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China
|
$6.65 | -- | $121B | 7.47x | $0.23 | 8.54% | 1.20x |
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology
|
$0.31 | -- | $3.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.91x |
|
DXF
Dunxin Financial Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
LX
LexinFintech Holdings
|
$6.55 | $11.55 | $1.1B | 6.17x | $0.11 | 2.78% | 0.58x |
|
NCTY
The9
|
$9.97 | -- | $140.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3.00x |
|
PT
Pintec Technology Holdings
|
$1.05 | -- | $16.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3.41x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PIAIF
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China
|
57.88% | 0.541 | 109.34% | 7.42x |
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology
|
-8.59% | -1.503 | 0.63% | 0.26x |
|
DXF
Dunxin Financial Holdings
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
LX
LexinFintech Holdings
|
32.45% | 1.103 | 43.67% | 0.81x |
|
NCTY
The9
|
-- | -0.020 | -- | -- |
|
PT
Pintec Technology Holdings
|
-- | -0.381 | -- | 0.21x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PIAIF
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China
|
-- | -- | 4.42% | 9.08% | 25.36% | -- |
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology
|
$176.4K | -$706.2K | -86.81% | -90.72% | -63.06% | $355.7K |
|
DXF
Dunxin Financial Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LX
LexinFintech Holdings
|
$167.6M | $64.5M | 8.49% | 12.65% | 17.27% | -- |
|
NCTY
The9
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PT
Pintec Technology Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PIAIF or AIHS?
Senmiao Technology has a net margin of 16.48% compared to Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's net margin of -61.46%. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's return on equity of 9.08% beat Senmiao Technology's return on equity of -90.72%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China-- $0.20 $362.2B AIHSSenmiao Technology19.18% -$0.05 $2.3M -
What do Analysts Say About PIAIF or AIHS?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Senmiao Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has higher upside potential than Senmiao Technology, analysts believe Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China is more attractive than Senmiao Technology.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China0 0 0 AIHSSenmiao Technology0 0 0 -
Is PIAIF or AIHS More Risky?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a beta of 0.373, which suggesting that the stock is 62.728% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Senmiao Technology has a beta of 0.599, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.108%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PIAIF or AIHS?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.54%. Senmiao Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China pays 48.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Senmiao Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PIAIF or AIHS?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China quarterly revenues are $22.5B, which are larger than Senmiao Technology quarterly revenues of $919.8K. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's net income of $3.7B is higher than Senmiao Technology's net income of -$565.3K. Notably, Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.47x while Senmiao Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China is 1.20x versus 0.91x for Senmiao Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China1.20x 7.47x $22.5B $3.7B AIHSSenmiao Technology0.91x -- $919.8K -$565.3K
-
Which has Higher Returns PIAIF or DXF?
Dunxin Financial Holdings has a net margin of 16.48% compared to Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's net margin of --. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's return on equity of 9.08% beat Dunxin Financial Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China-- $0.20 $362.2B DXFDunxin Financial Holdings-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PIAIF or DXF?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dunxin Financial Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has higher upside potential than Dunxin Financial Holdings, analysts believe Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China is more attractive than Dunxin Financial Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China0 0 0 DXFDunxin Financial Holdings0 0 0 -
Is PIAIF or DXF More Risky?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a beta of 0.373, which suggesting that the stock is 62.728% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dunxin Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PIAIF or DXF?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.54%. Dunxin Financial Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China pays 48.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Dunxin Financial Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PIAIF or DXF?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China quarterly revenues are $22.5B, which are larger than Dunxin Financial Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's net income of $3.7B is higher than Dunxin Financial Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.47x while Dunxin Financial Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China is 1.20x versus -- for Dunxin Financial Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China1.20x 7.47x $22.5B $3.7B DXFDunxin Financial Holdings-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PIAIF or LX?
LexinFintech Holdings has a net margin of 16.48% compared to Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's net margin of 13.86%. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's return on equity of 9.08% beat LexinFintech Holdings's return on equity of 12.65%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China-- $0.20 $362.2B LXLexinFintech Holdings39.27% $0.33 $2.3B -
What do Analysts Say About PIAIF or LX?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LexinFintech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $11.55 which suggests that it could grow by 76.3%. Given that LexinFintech Holdings has higher upside potential than Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China, analysts believe LexinFintech Holdings is more attractive than Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China0 0 0 LXLexinFintech Holdings4 0 0 -
Is PIAIF or LX More Risky?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a beta of 0.373, which suggesting that the stock is 62.728% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LexinFintech Holdings has a beta of 0.403, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.665%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PIAIF or LX?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.54%. LexinFintech Holdings offers a yield of 2.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China pays 48.52% of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings pays out 14.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PIAIF or LX?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China quarterly revenues are $22.5B, which are larger than LexinFintech Holdings quarterly revenues of $426.7M. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's net income of $3.7B is higher than LexinFintech Holdings's net income of $59.2M. Notably, Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.47x while LexinFintech Holdings's PE ratio is 6.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China is 1.20x versus 0.58x for LexinFintech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China1.20x 7.47x $22.5B $3.7B LXLexinFintech Holdings0.58x 6.17x $426.7M $59.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns PIAIF or NCTY?
The9 has a net margin of 16.48% compared to Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's net margin of --. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's return on equity of 9.08% beat The9's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China-- $0.20 $362.2B NCTYThe9-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PIAIF or NCTY?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The9 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has higher upside potential than The9, analysts believe Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China is more attractive than The9.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China0 0 0 NCTYThe90 0 0 -
Is PIAIF or NCTY More Risky?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a beta of 0.373, which suggesting that the stock is 62.728% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The9 has a beta of 1.725, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.478%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PIAIF or NCTY?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.54%. The9 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China pays 48.52% of its earnings as a dividend. The9 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PIAIF or NCTY?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China quarterly revenues are $22.5B, which are larger than The9 quarterly revenues of --. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's net income of $3.7B is higher than The9's net income of --. Notably, Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.47x while The9's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China is 1.20x versus 3.00x for The9. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China1.20x 7.47x $22.5B $3.7B NCTYThe93.00x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PIAIF or PT?
Pintec Technology Holdings has a net margin of 16.48% compared to Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's net margin of --. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's return on equity of 9.08% beat Pintec Technology Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China-- $0.20 $362.2B PTPintec Technology Holdings-- -- -$53.4M -
What do Analysts Say About PIAIF or PT?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pintec Technology Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has higher upside potential than Pintec Technology Holdings, analysts believe Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China is more attractive than Pintec Technology Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China0 0 0 PTPintec Technology Holdings0 0 0 -
Is PIAIF or PT More Risky?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a beta of 0.373, which suggesting that the stock is 62.728% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pintec Technology Holdings has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.195%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PIAIF or PT?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.54%. Pintec Technology Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China pays 48.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Pintec Technology Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PIAIF or PT?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China quarterly revenues are $22.5B, which are larger than Pintec Technology Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's net income of $3.7B is higher than Pintec Technology Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.47x while Pintec Technology Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China is 1.20x versus 3.41x for Pintec Technology Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PIAIFPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China1.20x 7.47x $22.5B $3.7B PTPintec Technology Holdings3.41x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…
Can Levi Stock Double?
Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 58x
Buy
62
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
82
SBET alert for Jul 17
SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 3.58% over the past day.
Buy
89
EXOD alert for Jul 17
Exodus Movement [EXOD] is down 4.66% over the past day.
Buy
60
U alert for Jul 17
Unity Software [U] is up 8.31% over the past day.
