MSADF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mizuho Financial Group has a net margin of -15.37% compared to MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings's net margin of 3.71%. MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings's return on equity of 16.36% beat Mizuho Financial Group's return on equity of 8.4%.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mizuho Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $6.22 which suggests that it could grow by 12.66%. Given that Mizuho Financial Group has higher upside potential than MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings, analysts believe Mizuho Financial Group is more attractive than MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings has a beta of 0.223, which suggesting that the stock is 77.685% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mizuho Financial Group has a beta of 0.370, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.971%.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.13%. Mizuho Financial Group offers a yield of 3.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings pays 27.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Mizuho Financial Group pays out 34.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings quarterly revenues are -$7.1B, which are smaller than Mizuho Financial Group quarterly revenues of $5.3B. MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings's net income of $1.1B is higher than Mizuho Financial Group's net income of $197.1M. Notably, MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.27x while Mizuho Financial Group's PE ratio is 12.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings is 0.79x versus 2.92x for Mizuho Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a net margin of -15.37% compared to MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings's net margin of 7.08%. MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings's return on equity of 16.36% beat Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's return on equity of 8.7%.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $14.48 which suggests that it could grow by 8.45%. Given that Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has higher upside potential than MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings, analysts believe Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group is more attractive than MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings has a beta of 0.223, which suggesting that the stock is 77.685% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a beta of 0.383, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.722%.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.13%. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group offers a yield of 3.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings pays 27.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group pays out 28.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings quarterly revenues are -$7.1B, which are smaller than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group quarterly revenues of $10.6B. MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings's net income of $1.1B is higher than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's net income of $747.7M. Notably, MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.27x while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's PE ratio is 12.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings is 0.79x versus 3.47x for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nomura Holdings has a net margin of -15.37% compared to MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings's net margin of 20.26%. MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings's return on equity of 16.36% beat Nomura Holdings's return on equity of 9.66%.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nomura Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $7.16 which suggests that it could grow by 13.63%. Given that Nomura Holdings has higher upside potential than MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings, analysts believe Nomura Holdings is more attractive than MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings has a beta of 0.223, which suggesting that the stock is 77.685% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nomura Holdings has a beta of 0.788, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.205%.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.13%. Nomura Holdings offers a yield of 6.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings pays 27.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomura Holdings pays out 33.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings quarterly revenues are -$7.1B, which are smaller than Nomura Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.3B. MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings's net income of $1.1B is higher than Nomura Holdings's net income of $472M. Notably, MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.27x while Nomura Holdings's PE ratio is 8.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings is 0.79x versus 1.77x for Nomura Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.