MCOM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Thor Industries has a net margin of -48.01% compared to Micromobility com's net margin of 4.67%. Micromobility com's return on equity of -- beat Thor Industries's return on equity of 5.48%.

Micromobility com has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 974995025%. On the other hand Thor Industries has an analysts' consensus of $88.08 which suggests that it could fall by -0.76%. Given that Micromobility com has higher upside potential than Thor Industries, analysts believe Micromobility com is more attractive than Thor Industries.

Micromobility com has a beta of 0.070, which suggesting that the stock is 92.954% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Thor Industries has a beta of 1.212, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.234%.

Micromobility com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Thor Industries offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Micromobility com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Thor Industries pays out 38.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Thor Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Micromobility com quarterly revenues are $477K, which are smaller than Thor Industries quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Micromobility com's net income of -$229K is lower than Thor Industries's net income of $135.2M. Notably, Micromobility com's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.02x while Thor Industries's PE ratio is 21.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Micromobility com is 0.16x versus 0.49x for Thor Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gentherm has a net margin of -48.01% compared to Micromobility com's net margin of -0.04%. Micromobility com's return on equity of -- beat Gentherm's return on equity of 7.79%.

Micromobility com has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 974995025%. On the other hand Gentherm has an analysts' consensus of $39.40 which suggests that it could grow by 26.65%. Given that Micromobility com has higher upside potential than Gentherm, analysts believe Micromobility com is more attractive than Gentherm.

Micromobility com has a beta of 0.070, which suggesting that the stock is 92.954% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gentherm has a beta of 1.419, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.9%.

Micromobility com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gentherm offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Micromobility com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gentherm pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Micromobility com quarterly revenues are $477K, which are smaller than Gentherm quarterly revenues of $353.9M. Micromobility com's net income of -$229K is lower than Gentherm's net income of -$128K. Notably, Micromobility com's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.02x while Gentherm's PE ratio is 19.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Micromobility com is 0.16x versus 0.67x for Gentherm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -48.01% compared to Micromobility com's net margin of 2.12%. Micromobility com's return on equity of -- beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Micromobility com has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 974995025%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $304.17 which suggests that it could fall by -5.44%. Given that Micromobility com has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Micromobility com is more attractive than Tesla.

Micromobility com has a beta of 0.070, which suggesting that the stock is 92.954% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.394, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.423%.

Micromobility com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Micromobility com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Micromobility com quarterly revenues are $477K, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Micromobility com's net income of -$229K is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Micromobility com's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.02x while Tesla's PE ratio is 176.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Micromobility com is 0.16x versus 11.78x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Winnebago Industries has a net margin of -48.01% compared to Micromobility com's net margin of 2.27%. Micromobility com's return on equity of -- beat Winnebago Industries's return on equity of -1.37%.

Micromobility com has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 974995025%. On the other hand Winnebago Industries has an analysts' consensus of $40.47 which suggests that it could grow by 35.85%. Given that Micromobility com has higher upside potential than Winnebago Industries, analysts believe Micromobility com is more attractive than Winnebago Industries.

Micromobility com has a beta of 0.070, which suggesting that the stock is 92.954% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.444%.

Micromobility com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Winnebago Industries offers a yield of 4.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Micromobility com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Winnebago Industries pays out 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend.

Micromobility com quarterly revenues are $477K, which are smaller than Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues of $775.1M. Micromobility com's net income of -$229K is lower than Winnebago Industries's net income of $17.6M. Notably, Micromobility com's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.02x while Winnebago Industries's PE ratio is 196.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Micromobility com is 0.16x versus 0.31x for Winnebago Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.