KYOCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Japan Food Tech Holdings has a net margin of -3.6% compared to Kyocera's net margin of -1471.96%. Kyocera's return on equity of 0.75% beat Japan Food Tech Holdings's return on equity of -241.02%.

Kyocera has a consensus price target of $12.32, signalling upside risk potential of 13.84%. On the other hand Japan Food Tech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kyocera has higher upside potential than Japan Food Tech Holdings, analysts believe Kyocera is more attractive than Japan Food Tech Holdings.

Kyocera has a beta of 0.307, which suggesting that the stock is 69.335% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Japan Food Tech Holdings has a beta of 45.515, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4451.471%.

Kyocera has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.13%. Japan Food Tech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kyocera pays 304.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Japan Food Tech Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kyocera quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Japan Food Tech Holdings quarterly revenues of $5.5K. Kyocera's net income of -$116.4M is lower than Japan Food Tech Holdings's net income of -$81.3K. Notably, Kyocera's price-to-earnings ratio is 92.76x while Japan Food Tech Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kyocera is 1.14x versus 0.00x for Japan Food Tech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kubota has a net margin of -3.6% compared to Kyocera's net margin of 5.8%. Kyocera's return on equity of 0.75% beat Kubota's return on equity of 9.61%.

Kyocera has a consensus price target of $12.32, signalling upside risk potential of 13.84%. On the other hand Kubota has an analysts' consensus of $62.80 which suggests that it could grow by 16.49%. Given that Kubota has higher upside potential than Kyocera, analysts believe Kubota is more attractive than Kyocera.

Kyocera has a beta of 0.307, which suggesting that the stock is 69.335% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kubota has a beta of 1.009, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.919%.

Kyocera has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.13%. Kubota offers a yield of 3.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Kyocera pays 304.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota pays out 24.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kyocera's is not.

Kyocera quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Kubota quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Kyocera's net income of -$116.4M is lower than Kubota's net income of $271.1M. Notably, Kyocera's price-to-earnings ratio is 92.76x while Kubota's PE ratio is 7.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kyocera is 1.14x versus 0.62x for Kubota. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LogProstyle has a net margin of -3.6% compared to Kyocera's net margin of --. Kyocera's return on equity of 0.75% beat LogProstyle's return on equity of --.

Kyocera has a consensus price target of $12.32, signalling upside risk potential of 13.84%. On the other hand LogProstyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kyocera has higher upside potential than LogProstyle, analysts believe Kyocera is more attractive than LogProstyle.

Kyocera has a beta of 0.307, which suggesting that the stock is 69.335% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LogProstyle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kyocera has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.13%. LogProstyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kyocera pays 304.23% of its earnings as a dividend. LogProstyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kyocera quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than LogProstyle quarterly revenues of --. Kyocera's net income of -$116.4M is higher than LogProstyle's net income of --. Notably, Kyocera's price-to-earnings ratio is 92.76x while LogProstyle's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kyocera is 1.14x versus -- for LogProstyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SECOM has a net margin of -3.6% compared to Kyocera's net margin of 9.53%. Kyocera's return on equity of 0.75% beat SECOM's return on equity of 7.58%.

Kyocera has a consensus price target of $12.32, signalling upside risk potential of 13.84%. On the other hand SECOM has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kyocera has higher upside potential than SECOM, analysts believe Kyocera is more attractive than SECOM.

Kyocera has a beta of 0.307, which suggesting that the stock is 69.335% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SECOM has a beta of 0.456, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.441%.

Kyocera has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.13%. SECOM offers a yield of 1.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Kyocera pays 304.23% of its earnings as a dividend. SECOM pays out 36.72% of its earnings as a dividend. SECOM's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kyocera's is not.

Kyocera quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than SECOM quarterly revenues of $2B. Kyocera's net income of -$116.4M is lower than SECOM's net income of $190.3M. Notably, Kyocera's price-to-earnings ratio is 92.76x while SECOM's PE ratio is 26.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kyocera is 1.14x versus 2.76x for SECOM. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.