KIMTF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Birks Group has a net margin of 8.54% compared to Kia's net margin of --. Kia's return on equity of 17.91% beat Birks Group's return on equity of --.

Kia has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Birks Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kia has higher upside potential than Birks Group, analysts believe Kia is more attractive than Birks Group.

Kia has a beta of -0.085, which suggesting that the stock is 108.528% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Birks Group has a beta of 0.335, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.506%.

Kia has a quarterly dividend of $4.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.85%. Birks Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kia pays 22.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Birks Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kia's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kia quarterly revenues are $19.3B, which are larger than Birks Group quarterly revenues of --. Kia's net income of $1.6B is higher than Birks Group's net income of --. Notably, Kia's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.77x while Birks Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kia is 0.15x versus 0.13x for Birks Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Document Security Systems has a net margin of 8.54% compared to Kia's net margin of --. Kia's return on equity of 17.91% beat Document Security Systems's return on equity of --.

Kia has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Document Security Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kia has higher upside potential than Document Security Systems, analysts believe Kia is more attractive than Document Security Systems.

Kia has a beta of -0.085, which suggesting that the stock is 108.528% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Document Security Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kia has a quarterly dividend of $4.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.85%. Document Security Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kia pays 22.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Document Security Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kia's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kia quarterly revenues are $19.3B, which are larger than Document Security Systems quarterly revenues of --. Kia's net income of $1.6B is higher than Document Security Systems's net income of --. Notably, Kia's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.77x while Document Security Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kia is 0.15x versus -- for Document Security Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Envela has a net margin of 8.54% compared to Kia's net margin of 5.17%. Kia's return on equity of 17.91% beat Envela's return on equity of 14.21%.

Kia has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Envela has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 51.03%. Given that Envela has higher upside potential than Kia, analysts believe Envela is more attractive than Kia.

Kia has a beta of -0.085, which suggesting that the stock is 108.528% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Envela has a beta of 0.122, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.8%.

Kia has a quarterly dividend of $4.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.85%. Envela offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kia pays 22.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Envela pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kia's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kia quarterly revenues are $19.3B, which are larger than Envela quarterly revenues of $48.3M. Kia's net income of $1.6B is higher than Envela's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Kia's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.77x while Envela's PE ratio is 22.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kia is 0.15x versus 0.87x for Envela. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyundai Motor has a net margin of 8.54% compared to Kia's net margin of 7.11%. Kia's return on equity of 17.91% beat Hyundai Motor's return on equity of 11.01%.

Kia has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hyundai Motor has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kia has higher upside potential than Hyundai Motor, analysts believe Kia is more attractive than Hyundai Motor.

Kia has a beta of -0.085, which suggesting that the stock is 108.528% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyundai Motor has a beta of 1.164, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.393%.

Kia has a quarterly dividend of $4.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.85%. Hyundai Motor offers a yield of 8.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share. Kia pays 22.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyundai Motor pays out 31.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kia quarterly revenues are $19.3B, which are smaller than Hyundai Motor quarterly revenues of $30.5B. Kia's net income of $1.6B is lower than Hyundai Motor's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Kia's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.77x while Hyundai Motor's PE ratio is 3.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kia is 0.15x versus 0.18x for Hyundai Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.