ELEEF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DevvStream has a net margin of 18.81% compared to Element Fleet Management's net margin of --. Element Fleet Management's return on equity of 14.01% beat DevvStream's return on equity of --.

Element Fleet Management has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DevvStream has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Element Fleet Management has higher upside potential than DevvStream, analysts believe Element Fleet Management is more attractive than DevvStream.

Element Fleet Management has a beta of 0.813, which suggesting that the stock is 18.654% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DevvStream has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Element Fleet Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.41%. DevvStream offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Element Fleet Management pays 37.91% of its earnings as a dividend. DevvStream pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Element Fleet Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Element Fleet Management quarterly revenues are $543.7M, which are larger than DevvStream quarterly revenues of $10.2K. Element Fleet Management's net income of $102.3M is higher than DevvStream's net income of $3.5M. Notably, Element Fleet Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.70x while DevvStream's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Element Fleet Management is 4.79x versus -- for DevvStream. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New Horizon Aircraft has a net margin of 18.81% compared to Element Fleet Management's net margin of --. Element Fleet Management's return on equity of 14.01% beat New Horizon Aircraft's return on equity of --.

Element Fleet Management has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand New Horizon Aircraft has an analysts' consensus of $1.87 which suggests that it could grow by 20.79%. Given that New Horizon Aircraft has higher upside potential than Element Fleet Management, analysts believe New Horizon Aircraft is more attractive than Element Fleet Management.

Element Fleet Management has a beta of 0.813, which suggesting that the stock is 18.654% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Horizon Aircraft has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Element Fleet Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.41%. New Horizon Aircraft offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Element Fleet Management pays 37.91% of its earnings as a dividend. New Horizon Aircraft pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Element Fleet Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Element Fleet Management quarterly revenues are $543.7M, which are larger than New Horizon Aircraft quarterly revenues of --. Element Fleet Management's net income of $102.3M is higher than New Horizon Aircraft's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Element Fleet Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.70x while New Horizon Aircraft's PE ratio is 5.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Element Fleet Management is 4.79x versus -- for New Horizon Aircraft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Senstar Technologies has a net margin of 18.81% compared to Element Fleet Management's net margin of 12.06%. Element Fleet Management's return on equity of 14.01% beat Senstar Technologies's return on equity of 11.81%.

Element Fleet Management has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Senstar Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Element Fleet Management has higher upside potential than Senstar Technologies, analysts believe Element Fleet Management is more attractive than Senstar Technologies.

Element Fleet Management has a beta of 0.813, which suggesting that the stock is 18.654% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Senstar Technologies has a beta of 1.010, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.031%.

Element Fleet Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.41%. Senstar Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Element Fleet Management pays 37.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Senstar Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Element Fleet Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Element Fleet Management quarterly revenues are $543.7M, which are larger than Senstar Technologies quarterly revenues of $8.4M. Element Fleet Management's net income of $102.3M is higher than Senstar Technologies's net income of $1M. Notably, Element Fleet Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.70x while Senstar Technologies's PE ratio is 23.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Element Fleet Management is 4.79x versus 2.88x for Senstar Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TOMI Environmental Solutions has a net margin of 18.81% compared to Element Fleet Management's net margin of -16.21%. Element Fleet Management's return on equity of 14.01% beat TOMI Environmental Solutions's return on equity of -57.67%.

Element Fleet Management has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TOMI Environmental Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $3.50 which suggests that it could grow by 264.51%. Given that TOMI Environmental Solutions has higher upside potential than Element Fleet Management, analysts believe TOMI Environmental Solutions is more attractive than Element Fleet Management.

Element Fleet Management has a beta of 0.813, which suggesting that the stock is 18.654% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOMI Environmental Solutions has a beta of 0.734, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.572%.

Element Fleet Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.41%. TOMI Environmental Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Element Fleet Management pays 37.91% of its earnings as a dividend. TOMI Environmental Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Element Fleet Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Element Fleet Management quarterly revenues are $543.7M, which are larger than TOMI Environmental Solutions quarterly revenues of $1.6M. Element Fleet Management's net income of $102.3M is higher than TOMI Environmental Solutions's net income of -$255.6K. Notably, Element Fleet Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.70x while TOMI Environmental Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Element Fleet Management is 4.79x versus 2.41x for TOMI Environmental Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.