DYNR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum has a net margin of 4.39% compared to DynaResource's net margin of 4.69%. DynaResource's return on equity of -45.45% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 18.99%.

DynaResource has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $22.50 which suggests that it could grow by 15.21%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than DynaResource, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than DynaResource.

DynaResource has a beta of 0.498, which suggesting that the stock is 50.172% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.547, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 154.749%.

DynaResource has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DynaResource pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DynaResource quarterly revenues are $13.7M, which are smaller than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $633.9M. DynaResource's net income of $601.4K is lower than Century Aluminum's net income of $29.7M. Notably, DynaResource's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 16.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DynaResource is 0.80x versus 0.80x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 4.39% compared to DynaResource's net margin of 4.14%. DynaResource's return on equity of -45.45% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.71%.

DynaResource has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that DynaResource has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe DynaResource is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

DynaResource has a beta of 0.498, which suggesting that the stock is 50.172% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.485, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.545%.

DynaResource has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. DynaResource pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 18.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DynaResource quarterly revenues are $13.7M, which are smaller than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $129.2M. DynaResource's net income of $601.4K is lower than Friedman Industries's net income of $5.3M. Notably, DynaResource's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 18.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DynaResource is 0.80x versus 0.24x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 4.39% compared to DynaResource's net margin of --. DynaResource's return on equity of -45.45% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

DynaResource has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 149.19%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than DynaResource, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than DynaResource.

DynaResource has a beta of 0.498, which suggesting that the stock is 50.172% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.135, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.451%.

DynaResource has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DynaResource pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DynaResource quarterly revenues are $13.7M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. DynaResource's net income of $601.4K is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, DynaResource's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DynaResource is 0.80x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 4.39% compared to DynaResource's net margin of --. DynaResource's return on equity of -45.45% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

DynaResource has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 128.94%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than DynaResource, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than DynaResource.

DynaResource has a beta of 0.498, which suggesting that the stock is 50.172% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.465, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.534%.

DynaResource has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DynaResource pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DynaResource quarterly revenues are $13.7M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. DynaResource's net income of $601.4K is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, DynaResource's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DynaResource is 0.80x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.