AUTLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EESTech has a net margin of -- compared to Austal's net margin of --. Austal's return on equity of 2.76% beat EESTech's return on equity of --.

Austal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EESTech has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Austal has higher upside potential than EESTech, analysts believe Austal is more attractive than EESTech.

Austal has a beta of 0.973, which suggesting that the stock is 2.681% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EESTech has a beta of -0.875, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 187.493%.

Austal has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EESTech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Austal pays 73.09% of its earnings as a dividend. EESTech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Austal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Austal quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than EESTech quarterly revenues of --. Austal's net income of -- is lower than EESTech's net income of -$201.5K. Notably, Austal's price-to-earnings ratio is 80.74x while EESTech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Austal is 1.26x versus 854.57x for EESTech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Globavend Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Austal's net margin of --. Austal's return on equity of 2.76% beat Globavend Holdings's return on equity of 73.61%.

Austal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Globavend Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $0.40 which suggests that it could grow by 751.06%. Given that Globavend Holdings has higher upside potential than Austal, analysts believe Globavend Holdings is more attractive than Austal.

Austal has a beta of 0.973, which suggesting that the stock is 2.681% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Globavend Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Austal has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Globavend Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Austal pays 73.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Globavend Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Austal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Austal quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Globavend Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Austal's net income of -- is lower than Globavend Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Austal's price-to-earnings ratio is 80.74x while Globavend Holdings's PE ratio is 6.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Austal is 1.26x versus 0.12x for Globavend Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GWA Group has a net margin of -- compared to Austal's net margin of --. Austal's return on equity of 2.76% beat GWA Group's return on equity of 14.52%.

Austal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GWA Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Austal has higher upside potential than GWA Group, analysts believe Austal is more attractive than GWA Group.

Austal has a beta of 0.973, which suggesting that the stock is 2.681% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GWA Group has a beta of -0.111, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.07%.

Austal has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GWA Group offers a yield of 6.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Austal pays 73.09% of its earnings as a dividend. GWA Group pays out 96.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Austal quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than GWA Group quarterly revenues of --. Austal's net income of -- is lower than GWA Group's net income of --. Notably, Austal's price-to-earnings ratio is 80.74x while GWA Group's PE ratio is 13.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Austal is 1.26x versus 1.44x for GWA Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NOVONIX has a net margin of -- compared to Austal's net margin of --. Austal's return on equity of 2.76% beat NOVONIX's return on equity of --.

Austal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NOVONIX has an analysts' consensus of $3.30 which suggests that it could grow by 122.97%. Given that NOVONIX has higher upside potential than Austal, analysts believe NOVONIX is more attractive than Austal.

Austal has a beta of 0.973, which suggesting that the stock is 2.681% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NOVONIX has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Austal has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NOVONIX offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Austal pays 73.09% of its earnings as a dividend. NOVONIX pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Austal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Austal quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NOVONIX quarterly revenues of --. Austal's net income of -- is lower than NOVONIX's net income of --. Notably, Austal's price-to-earnings ratio is 80.74x while NOVONIX's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Austal is 1.26x versus -- for NOVONIX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.