AMKBY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DSV AS has a net margin of 8.72% compared to A P Moller Maersk AS's net margin of 6.71%. A P Moller Maersk AS's return on equity of 12.79% beat DSV AS's return on equity of 11.92%.

A P Moller Maersk AS has a consensus price target of $9.80, signalling downside risk potential of -2.56%. On the other hand DSV AS has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that A P Moller Maersk AS has higher upside potential than DSV AS, analysts believe A P Moller Maersk AS is more attractive than DSV AS.

A P Moller Maersk AS has a beta of 1.091, which suggesting that the stock is 9.057% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DSV AS has a beta of 1.234, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.354%.

A P Moller Maersk AS has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.41%. DSV AS offers a yield of 0.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. A P Moller Maersk AS pays 21.82% of its earnings as a dividend. DSV AS pays out 15.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A P Moller Maersk AS quarterly revenues are $13.3B, which are larger than DSV AS quarterly revenues of $5.9B. A P Moller Maersk AS's net income of $1.2B is higher than DSV AS's net income of $394.3M. Notably, A P Moller Maersk AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.46x while DSV AS's PE ratio is 34.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A P Moller Maersk AS is 0.56x versus 2.16x for DSV AS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FLSmidth & Co AS has a net margin of 8.72% compared to A P Moller Maersk AS's net margin of 7.34%. A P Moller Maersk AS's return on equity of 12.79% beat FLSmidth & Co AS's return on equity of 10.23%.

A P Moller Maersk AS has a consensus price target of $9.80, signalling downside risk potential of -2.56%. On the other hand FLSmidth & Co AS has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that A P Moller Maersk AS has higher upside potential than FLSmidth & Co AS, analysts believe A P Moller Maersk AS is more attractive than FLSmidth & Co AS.

A P Moller Maersk AS has a beta of 1.091, which suggesting that the stock is 9.057% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FLSmidth & Co AS has a beta of 0.055, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.487%.

A P Moller Maersk AS has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.41%. FLSmidth & Co AS offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. A P Moller Maersk AS pays 21.82% of its earnings as a dividend. FLSmidth & Co AS pays out 22.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A P Moller Maersk AS quarterly revenues are $13.3B, which are larger than FLSmidth & Co AS quarterly revenues of $666.7M. A P Moller Maersk AS's net income of $1.2B is higher than FLSmidth & Co AS's net income of $48.9M. Notably, A P Moller Maersk AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.46x while FLSmidth & Co AS's PE ratio is 20.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A P Moller Maersk AS is 0.56x versus 1.19x for FLSmidth & Co AS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LiqTech International has a net margin of 8.72% compared to A P Moller Maersk AS's net margin of -50.92%. A P Moller Maersk AS's return on equity of 12.79% beat LiqTech International's return on equity of -73.68%.

A P Moller Maersk AS has a consensus price target of $9.80, signalling downside risk potential of -2.56%. On the other hand LiqTech International has an analysts' consensus of $3.60 which suggests that it could grow by 98.9%. Given that LiqTech International has higher upside potential than A P Moller Maersk AS, analysts believe LiqTech International is more attractive than A P Moller Maersk AS.

A P Moller Maersk AS has a beta of 1.091, which suggesting that the stock is 9.057% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LiqTech International has a beta of 0.911, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.884%.

A P Moller Maersk AS has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.41%. LiqTech International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. A P Moller Maersk AS pays 21.82% of its earnings as a dividend. LiqTech International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. A P Moller Maersk AS's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A P Moller Maersk AS quarterly revenues are $13.3B, which are larger than LiqTech International quarterly revenues of $4.6M. A P Moller Maersk AS's net income of $1.2B is higher than LiqTech International's net income of -$2.4M. Notably, A P Moller Maersk AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.46x while LiqTech International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A P Moller Maersk AS is 0.56x versus 0.88x for LiqTech International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vestas Wind Systems AS has a net margin of 8.72% compared to A P Moller Maersk AS's net margin of 0.14%. A P Moller Maersk AS's return on equity of 12.79% beat Vestas Wind Systems AS's return on equity of 17.97%.

A P Moller Maersk AS has a consensus price target of $9.80, signalling downside risk potential of -2.56%. On the other hand Vestas Wind Systems AS has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that A P Moller Maersk AS has higher upside potential than Vestas Wind Systems AS, analysts believe A P Moller Maersk AS is more attractive than Vestas Wind Systems AS.

A P Moller Maersk AS has a beta of 1.091, which suggesting that the stock is 9.057% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vestas Wind Systems AS has a beta of 1.294, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.44%.

A P Moller Maersk AS has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.41%. Vestas Wind Systems AS offers a yield of 0.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. A P Moller Maersk AS pays 21.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Vestas Wind Systems AS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. A P Moller Maersk AS's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A P Moller Maersk AS quarterly revenues are $13.3B, which are larger than Vestas Wind Systems AS quarterly revenues of $3.6B. A P Moller Maersk AS's net income of $1.2B is higher than Vestas Wind Systems AS's net income of $5.3M. Notably, A P Moller Maersk AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.46x while Vestas Wind Systems AS's PE ratio is 27.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A P Moller Maersk AS is 0.56x versus 0.85x for Vestas Wind Systems AS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.