Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…
Sell
49
ACGBF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.66
Seasonality move
:
-2.9%
Day range:
$0.66 - $0.66
52-week range:
$0.42 - $0.76
Dividend yield:
5.11%
P/E ratio:
6.34x
P/S ratio:
2.53x
P/B ratio:
0.55x
Volume:
3.5K
Avg. volume:
14.5K
1-year change:
50.02%
Market cap:
$231B
Revenue:
$99B
EPS (TTM):
$0.10
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACGBF
Agricultural Bank of China
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$498.7M | $1.94 | 24.73% | 47.13% | $150.11 |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TROO
TROOPS
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACGBF
Agricultural Bank of China
|
$0.66 | -- | $231B | 6.34x | $0.02 | 5.11% | 2.53x |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$143.59 | $150.11 | $20B | 23.94x | $2.00 | 0% | 10.01x |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
$3.35 | -- | $128.6M | 11.24x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.58x |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
$1.49 | -- | $6.1M | -- | $0.01 | 0% | 4.60x |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
$1.23 | -- | $45.6M | 61.61x | $0.00 | 0% | 15.11x |
|
TROO
TROOPS
|
$0.82 | -- | $92.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 8.31x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACGBF
Agricultural Bank of China
|
53.05% | -1.004 | 203.95% | 48.29x |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
26.33% | 1.603 | 9.77% | 0.58x |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
22.88% | 0.081 | 9.26% | 0.30x |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | 2.375 | -- | 56.19x |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | 0.772 | -- | 3.64x |
|
TROO
TROOPS
|
18.45% | 4.218 | 6.4% | 2.30x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACGBF
Agricultural Bank of China
|
-- | -- | 4.63% | 9.25% | 125.69% | -$106.4B |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$507.1M | $345.1M | 19.05% | 23.51% | 57.2% | -- |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
-- | -- | -27.01% | -30.78% | -- | -- |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | -- | -0.43% | -0.43% | -- | -- |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | -- | 2.73% | 2.73% | -- | -- |
|
TROO
TROOPS
|
-- | -- | -3.12% | -3.38% | -- | -- |
Agricultural Bank of China vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ACGBF or FUTU?
Futu Holdings has a net margin of 38.55% compared to Agricultural Bank of China's net margin of 45.7%. Agricultural Bank of China's return on equity of 9.25% beat Futu Holdings's return on equity of 23.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACGBFAgricultural Bank of China-- $0.03 $920.7B FUTUFutu Holdings84.05% $1.96 $5.3B -
What do Analysts Say About ACGBF or FUTU?
Agricultural Bank of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Futu Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $150.11 which suggests that it could grow by 4.54%. Given that Futu Holdings has higher upside potential than Agricultural Bank of China, analysts believe Futu Holdings is more attractive than Agricultural Bank of China.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACGBFAgricultural Bank of China0 0 0 FUTUFutu Holdings10 2 0 -
Is ACGBF or FUTU More Risky?
Agricultural Bank of China has a beta of -0.310, which suggesting that the stock is 130.969% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Futu Holdings has a beta of 0.600, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACGBF or FUTU?
Agricultural Bank of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.11%. Futu Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Agricultural Bank of China pays 74.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Futu Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agricultural Bank of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACGBF or FUTU?
Agricultural Bank of China quarterly revenues are $25.7B, which are larger than Futu Holdings quarterly revenues of $603.4M. Agricultural Bank of China's net income of $9.9B is higher than Futu Holdings's net income of $275.7M. Notably, Agricultural Bank of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.34x while Futu Holdings's PE ratio is 23.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agricultural Bank of China is 2.53x versus 10.01x for Futu Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACGBFAgricultural Bank of China2.53x 6.34x $25.7B $9.9B FUTUFutu Holdings10.01x 23.94x $603.4M $275.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns ACGBF or MATH?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a net margin of 38.55% compared to Agricultural Bank of China's net margin of --. Agricultural Bank of China's return on equity of 9.25% beat Metalpha Technology Holding's return on equity of -30.78%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACGBFAgricultural Bank of China-- $0.03 $920.7B MATHMetalpha Technology Holding-- -- $21.9M -
What do Analysts Say About ACGBF or MATH?
Agricultural Bank of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Metalpha Technology Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Agricultural Bank of China has higher upside potential than Metalpha Technology Holding, analysts believe Agricultural Bank of China is more attractive than Metalpha Technology Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACGBFAgricultural Bank of China0 0 0 MATHMetalpha Technology Holding0 0 0 -
Is ACGBF or MATH More Risky?
Agricultural Bank of China has a beta of -0.310, which suggesting that the stock is 130.969% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metalpha Technology Holding has a beta of -1.005, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 200.522%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACGBF or MATH?
Agricultural Bank of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.11%. Metalpha Technology Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Agricultural Bank of China pays 74.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Metalpha Technology Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agricultural Bank of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACGBF or MATH?
Agricultural Bank of China quarterly revenues are $25.7B, which are larger than Metalpha Technology Holding quarterly revenues of --. Agricultural Bank of China's net income of $9.9B is higher than Metalpha Technology Holding's net income of --. Notably, Agricultural Bank of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.34x while Metalpha Technology Holding's PE ratio is 11.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agricultural Bank of China is 2.53x versus 3.58x for Metalpha Technology Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACGBFAgricultural Bank of China2.53x 6.34x $25.7B $9.9B MATHMetalpha Technology Holding3.58x 11.24x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ACGBF or MEGL?
Magic Empire Global has a net margin of 38.55% compared to Agricultural Bank of China's net margin of --. Agricultural Bank of China's return on equity of 9.25% beat Magic Empire Global's return on equity of -0.43%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACGBFAgricultural Bank of China-- $0.03 $920.7B MEGLMagic Empire Global-- -- $17.3M -
What do Analysts Say About ACGBF or MEGL?
Agricultural Bank of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Magic Empire Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Agricultural Bank of China has higher upside potential than Magic Empire Global, analysts believe Agricultural Bank of China is more attractive than Magic Empire Global.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACGBFAgricultural Bank of China0 0 0 MEGLMagic Empire Global0 0 0 -
Is ACGBF or MEGL More Risky?
Agricultural Bank of China has a beta of -0.310, which suggesting that the stock is 130.969% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Empire Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACGBF or MEGL?
Agricultural Bank of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.11%. Magic Empire Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Agricultural Bank of China pays 74.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Empire Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agricultural Bank of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACGBF or MEGL?
Agricultural Bank of China quarterly revenues are $25.7B, which are larger than Magic Empire Global quarterly revenues of --. Agricultural Bank of China's net income of $9.9B is higher than Magic Empire Global's net income of --. Notably, Agricultural Bank of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.34x while Magic Empire Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agricultural Bank of China is 2.53x versus 4.60x for Magic Empire Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACGBFAgricultural Bank of China2.53x 6.34x $25.7B $9.9B MEGLMagic Empire Global4.60x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ACGBF or TOP?
TOP Financial Group has a net margin of 38.55% compared to Agricultural Bank of China's net margin of --. Agricultural Bank of China's return on equity of 9.25% beat TOP Financial Group's return on equity of 2.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACGBFAgricultural Bank of China-- $0.03 $920.7B TOPTOP Financial Group-- -- $40.5M -
What do Analysts Say About ACGBF or TOP?
Agricultural Bank of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TOP Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Agricultural Bank of China has higher upside potential than TOP Financial Group, analysts believe Agricultural Bank of China is more attractive than TOP Financial Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACGBFAgricultural Bank of China0 0 0 TOPTOP Financial Group0 0 0 -
Is ACGBF or TOP More Risky?
Agricultural Bank of China has a beta of -0.310, which suggesting that the stock is 130.969% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOP Financial Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACGBF or TOP?
Agricultural Bank of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.11%. TOP Financial Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Agricultural Bank of China pays 74.61% of its earnings as a dividend. TOP Financial Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agricultural Bank of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACGBF or TOP?
Agricultural Bank of China quarterly revenues are $25.7B, which are larger than TOP Financial Group quarterly revenues of --. Agricultural Bank of China's net income of $9.9B is higher than TOP Financial Group's net income of --. Notably, Agricultural Bank of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.34x while TOP Financial Group's PE ratio is 61.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agricultural Bank of China is 2.53x versus 15.11x for TOP Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACGBFAgricultural Bank of China2.53x 6.34x $25.7B $9.9B TOPTOP Financial Group15.11x 61.61x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ACGBF or TROO?
TROOPS has a net margin of 38.55% compared to Agricultural Bank of China's net margin of --. Agricultural Bank of China's return on equity of 9.25% beat TROOPS's return on equity of -3.38%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACGBFAgricultural Bank of China-- $0.03 $920.7B TROOTROOPS-- -- $72.6M -
What do Analysts Say About ACGBF or TROO?
Agricultural Bank of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TROOPS has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Agricultural Bank of China has higher upside potential than TROOPS, analysts believe Agricultural Bank of China is more attractive than TROOPS.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACGBFAgricultural Bank of China0 0 0 TROOTROOPS0 0 0 -
Is ACGBF or TROO More Risky?
Agricultural Bank of China has a beta of -0.310, which suggesting that the stock is 130.969% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TROOPS has a beta of 2.543, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 154.261%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACGBF or TROO?
Agricultural Bank of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.11%. TROOPS offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Agricultural Bank of China pays 74.61% of its earnings as a dividend. TROOPS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agricultural Bank of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACGBF or TROO?
Agricultural Bank of China quarterly revenues are $25.7B, which are larger than TROOPS quarterly revenues of --. Agricultural Bank of China's net income of $9.9B is higher than TROOPS's net income of --. Notably, Agricultural Bank of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.34x while TROOPS's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agricultural Bank of China is 2.53x versus 8.31x for TROOPS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACGBFAgricultural Bank of China2.53x 6.34x $25.7B $9.9B TROOTROOPS8.31x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Can Levi Stock Double?
Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…
How High Can SharkNinja Stock Go?
If you know popular consumer appliance brands Shark and Ninja,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 58x
Buy
62
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
82
SBET alert for Jul 17
SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 6.55% over the past day.
Buy
89
EXOD alert for Jul 17
Exodus Movement [EXOD] is up 1.36% over the past day.
Sell
42
VLCN alert for Jul 17
Volcon [VLCN] is up 212.87% over the past day.
