Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Sell
48
SMOG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$114.24
Seasonality move
:
-1.61%
Day range:
$114.24 - $114.78
52-week range:
$88.51 - $114.78
Dividend yield:
1.42%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
706
Avg. volume:
1.7K
1-year change:
10.91%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAYS
Global X Solar ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
$114.62 | -- | -- | -- | $1.62 | 1.42% | -- |
|
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
|
$24.72 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 1.87% | -- |
|
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
|
$23.51 | -- | -- | -- | $0.26 | 1.51% | -- |
|
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
|
$115.53 | -- | -- | -- | $0.61 | 0.53% | -- |
|
RAYS
Global X Solar ETF
|
$9.47 | -- | -- | -- | $0.01 | 0.45% | -- |
|
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
|
$37.97 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 0.44% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | 0.593 | -- | -- |
|
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
|
-- | 1.166 | -- | -- |
|
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
|
-- | 3.196 | -- | -- |
|
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
|
-- | 2.469 | -- | -- |
|
RAYS
Global X Solar ETF
|
-- | 1.185 | -- | -- |
|
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
|
-- | 1.536 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAYS
Global X Solar ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SMOG or DRIV?
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- DRIVGlobal X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SMOG or DRIV?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF, analysts believe VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is more attractive than Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF0 0 0 DRIVGlobal X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF0 0 0 -
Is SMOG or DRIV More Risky?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a beta of 1.275, which suggesting that the stock is 27.539% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF has a beta of 1.449, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.881%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMOG or DRIV?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF offers a yield of 1.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMOG or DRIV?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- -- DRIVGlobal X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SMOG or HYDR?
Global X Hydrogen ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Hydrogen ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- HYDRGlobal X Hydrogen ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SMOG or HYDR?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Hydrogen ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Hydrogen ETF, analysts believe VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is more attractive than Global X Hydrogen ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF0 0 0 HYDRGlobal X Hydrogen ETF0 0 0 -
Is SMOG or HYDR More Risky?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a beta of 1.275, which suggesting that the stock is 27.539% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Hydrogen ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMOG or HYDR?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. Global X Hydrogen ETF offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Hydrogen ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMOG or HYDR?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Hydrogen ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Hydrogen ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Hydrogen ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Hydrogen ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- -- HYDRGlobal X Hydrogen ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SMOG or NLR?
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- NLRVanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SMOG or NLR?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF, analysts believe VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is more attractive than VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF0 0 0 NLRVanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF0 0 0 -
Is SMOG or NLR More Risky?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a beta of 1.275, which suggesting that the stock is 27.539% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF has a beta of 0.729, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.105%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMOG or NLR?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMOG or NLR?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- -- NLRVanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SMOG or RAYS?
Global X Solar ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Solar ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- RAYSGlobal X Solar ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SMOG or RAYS?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Solar ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Solar ETF, analysts believe VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is more attractive than Global X Solar ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF0 0 0 RAYSGlobal X Solar ETF0 0 0 -
Is SMOG or RAYS More Risky?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a beta of 1.275, which suggesting that the stock is 27.539% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Solar ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMOG or RAYS?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. Global X Solar ETF offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Solar ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMOG or RAYS?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Solar ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Solar ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Solar ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Solar ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- -- RAYSGlobal X Solar ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SMOG or TAN?
Invesco Solar ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Solar ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- TANInvesco Solar ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SMOG or TAN?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Solar ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Solar ETF, analysts believe VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is more attractive than Invesco Solar ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF0 0 0 TANInvesco Solar ETF0 0 0 -
Is SMOG or TAN More Risky?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a beta of 1.275, which suggesting that the stock is 27.539% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Solar ETF has a beta of 1.520, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.994%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMOG or TAN?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. Invesco Solar ETF offers a yield of 0.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Solar ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMOG or TAN?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Solar ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Solar ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Solar ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Solar ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- -- TANInvesco Solar ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…
Can Levi Stock Double?
Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…
Stock Ideas
Buy
71
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 59x
Buy
51
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
72
SBET alert for Jul 18
SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 2.6% over the past day.
Buy
68
MCRI alert for Jul 18
Monarch Casino & Resort [MCRI] is up 19.81% over the past day.
Sell
41
NEGG alert for Jul 18
Newegg Commerce [NEGG] is up 17.85% over the past day.
