Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Sell
19
PCCE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$12.63
Seasonality move
:
41%
Day range:
$12.91 - $12.91
52-week range:
$9.35 - $14.05
Dividend yield:
1.64%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
5
Avg. volume:
95
1-year change:
28.18%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCCE
Polen Capital China Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCCE
Polen Capital China Growth ETF
|
$12.91 | -- | -- | -- | $0.21 | 1.64% | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
$36.42 | -- | -- | -- | $0.32 | 1.48% | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
$22.46 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 2.68% | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
$37.59 | -- | -- | -- | $0.51 | 2.55% | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
$90.49 | -- | -- | -- | $1.00 | 2.77% | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
$56.92 | -- | -- | -- | $0.54 | 2.51% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCCE
Polen Capital China Growth ETF
|
-- | 0.879 | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | 0.926 | -- | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | 0.764 | -- | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | 0.639 | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | 0.704 | -- | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
-- | 0.748 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCCE
Polen Capital China Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Polen Capital China Growth ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PCCE or CXSE?
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net margin of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF-- -- -- CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PCCE or CXSE?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Polen Capital China Growth ETF has higher upside potential than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund, analysts believe Polen Capital China Growth ETF is more attractive than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF0 0 0 CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund0 0 0 -
Is PCCE or CXSE More Risky?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has a beta of 0.953, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.728%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCCE or CXSE?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.64%. WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund offers a yield of 1.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Polen Capital China Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCCE or CXSE?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund quarterly revenues of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's net income of --. Notably, Polen Capital China Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polen Capital China Growth ETF is -- versus -- for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF-- -- -- -- CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PCCE or FLCH?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net margin of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat Franklin FTSE China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF-- -- -- FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PCCE or FLCH?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin FTSE China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Polen Capital China Growth ETF has higher upside potential than Franklin FTSE China ETF, analysts believe Polen Capital China Growth ETF is more attractive than Franklin FTSE China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF0 0 0 FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF0 0 0 -
Is PCCE or FLCH More Risky?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin FTSE China ETF has a beta of 0.901, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.892%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCCE or FLCH?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.64%. Franklin FTSE China ETF offers a yield of 2.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Polen Capital China Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin FTSE China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCCE or FLCH?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin FTSE China ETF quarterly revenues of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than Franklin FTSE China ETF's net income of --. Notably, Polen Capital China Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin FTSE China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polen Capital China Growth ETF is -- versus -- for Franklin FTSE China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF-- -- -- -- FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PCCE or FXI?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net margin of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares China Large-Cap ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF-- -- -- FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PCCE or FXI?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares China Large-Cap ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Polen Capital China Growth ETF has higher upside potential than iShares China Large-Cap ETF, analysts believe Polen Capital China Growth ETF is more attractive than iShares China Large-Cap ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF0 0 0 FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF0 0 0 -
Is PCCE or FXI More Risky?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a beta of 0.921, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.887%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCCE or FXI?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.64%. iShares China Large-Cap ETF offers a yield of 2.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Polen Capital China Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares China Large-Cap ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCCE or FXI?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares China Large-Cap ETF quarterly revenues of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net income of --. Notably, Polen Capital China Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares China Large-Cap ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polen Capital China Growth ETF is -- versus -- for iShares China Large-Cap ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF-- -- -- -- FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PCCE or GXC?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net margin of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF-- -- -- GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PCCE or GXC?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR S&P China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Polen Capital China Growth ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR S&P China ETF, analysts believe Polen Capital China Growth ETF is more attractive than SPDR S&P China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF0 0 0 GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 -
Is PCCE or GXC More Risky?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.879, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.101%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCCE or GXC?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.64%. SPDR S&P China ETF offers a yield of 2.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Polen Capital China Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR S&P China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCCE or GXC?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of --. Notably, Polen Capital China Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR S&P China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polen Capital China Growth ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR S&P China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF-- -- -- -- GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PCCE or MCHI?
iShares MSCI China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net margin of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF-- -- -- MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PCCE or MCHI?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Polen Capital China Growth ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI China ETF, analysts believe Polen Capital China Growth ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF0 0 0 MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF0 0 0 -
Is PCCE or MCHI More Risky?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI China ETF has a beta of 0.903, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.713%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCCE or MCHI?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.64%. iShares MSCI China ETF offers a yield of 2.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. Polen Capital China Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCCE or MCHI?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI China ETF quarterly revenues of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI China ETF's net income of --. Notably, Polen Capital China Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polen Capital China Growth ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF-- -- -- -- MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…
Can Levi Stock Double?
Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…
Stock Ideas
Buy
71
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 59x
Buy
51
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
80
SOC alert for Jul 18
Sable Offshore [SOC] is up 11.86% over the past day.
Buy
71
PGY alert for Jul 18
Pagaya Technologies [PGY] is up 5.56% over the past day.
Buy
68
MCRI alert for Jul 18
Monarch Casino & Resort [MCRI] is up 0.31% over the past day.
