Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Buy
63
NBCE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$27.39
Seasonality move
:
15.08%
Day range:
$27.74 - $27.74
52-week range:
$21.63 - $32.33
Dividend yield:
1.06%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
3
Avg. volume:
87
1-year change:
19.45%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NBCE
Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGRO
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAYC
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NBCE
Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF
|
$27.74 | -- | -- | -- | $0.29 | 1.06% | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
$28.39 | -- | -- | -- | $0.30 | 1.06% | -- |
|
CGRO
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF
|
$27.28 | -- | -- | -- | $0.57 | 2.07% | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
$24.86 | -- | -- | -- | $0.51 | 2.06% | -- |
|
RAYC
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF
|
$15.48 | -- | -- | -- | $0.58 | 3.76% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NBCE
Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF
|
-- | 0.748 | -- | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | 0.718 | -- | -- |
|
CGRO
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF
|
-- | 0.449 | -- | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
-- | 0.696 | -- | -- |
|
RAYC
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF
|
-- | 0.772 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NBCE
Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGRO
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAYC
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NBCE or ASHR?
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF's net margin of --. Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NBCENeuberger Berman China Equity ETF-- -- -- ASHRXtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NBCE or ASHR?
Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF, analysts believe Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NBCENeuberger Berman China Equity ETF0 0 0 ASHRXtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF0 0 0 -
Is NBCE or ASHR More Risky?
Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a beta of 0.722, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.77%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NBCE or ASHR?
Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NBCE or ASHR?
Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF quarterly revenues of --. Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's net income of --. Notably, Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NBCENeuberger Berman China Equity ETF-- -- -- -- ASHRXtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NBCE or CGRO?
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF's net margin of --. Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NBCENeuberger Berman China Equity ETF-- -- -- CGROCoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NBCE or CGRO?
Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF has higher upside potential than CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF, analysts believe Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF is more attractive than CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NBCENeuberger Berman China Equity ETF0 0 0 CGROCoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is NBCE or CGRO More Risky?
Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NBCE or CGRO?
Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF offers a yield of 2.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NBCE or CGRO?
Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF is -- versus -- for CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NBCENeuberger Berman China Equity ETF-- -- -- -- CGROCoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NBCE or KBA?
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF's net margin of --. Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NBCENeuberger Berman China Equity ETF-- -- -- KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NBCE or KBA?
Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF, analysts believe Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF is more attractive than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NBCENeuberger Berman China Equity ETF0 0 0 KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF0 0 0 -
Is NBCE or KBA More Risky?
Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a beta of 0.689, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.146%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NBCE or KBA?
Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF offers a yield of 2.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NBCE or KBA?
Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF quarterly revenues of --. Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's net income of --. Notably, Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NBCENeuberger Berman China Equity ETF-- -- -- -- KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NBCE or RAYC?
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF's net margin of --. Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NBCENeuberger Berman China Equity ETF-- -- -- RAYCRayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NBCE or RAYC?
Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF has higher upside potential than Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF, analysts believe Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF is more attractive than Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NBCENeuberger Berman China Equity ETF0 0 0 RAYCRayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is NBCE or RAYC More Risky?
Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NBCE or RAYC?
Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF offers a yield of 3.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NBCE or RAYC?
Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF is -- versus -- for Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NBCENeuberger Berman China Equity ETF-- -- -- -- RAYCRayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…
Can Levi Stock Double?
Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…
Stock Ideas
Buy
71
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 59x
Buy
51
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
80
SOC alert for Jul 18
Sable Offshore [SOC] is up 11.86% over the past day.
Buy
71
PGY alert for Jul 18
Pagaya Technologies [PGY] is up 5.56% over the past day.
Buy
68
MCRI alert for Jul 18
Monarch Casino & Resort [MCRI] is up 0.31% over the past day.
